Have leftists voted to discriminate and get rid of the people born in Saxony-Anhalt?
In fact, which antisemitic leftists are close to governing anywhere in Germany right now? Have any antisemitic left party reached 44% of the vote anywhere?
And third question you will certainly answer without fail: which party wants to talk less about the Shoah and uses nazi slogans casually in its communication?
Very simple. Being poorer than neighbours makes you angry. Then you vote for those who can bring misery to everyone so when everyone is screwed you will be fine again. Of course there are natural reasons for being poorer than neighbours - brain drain, geopolitical and economical changes. No government can help for some people, as those are unable to accept help, as they will sabotage any effort for one reason or another. In a sense it's inevitable, the entropy produces this pockets of isolated misery, which build upon itself, like dark matter does. Eventually the gases need to be released to produce a new equilibrium, sometimes in some sort of big bang
I think (relative) poverty is not an explanation on its own.
This is my take:
Poverty makes people not vote for some parties. But making so many vote for a party, especially with unconstitutional goals, is the result of a lot of desinformation. The AfD uses any possible opportunity and any possible topic to tell people that Germany is rotten to the core - while it is truly one of the riches country in the world with mandatory health insurance and unemployment compensation. (Not saying that Germany does not have significant problems. Far from.) Then, they tell people whom to blame (refugees, jews, homosexuals etc.). This builds up hatred. it is not important whether anything of this is true at all. All that counts is: They can continue to be angry.
There are enough YouTubers who show AfD voters contradictions in their arguments. The AfD voters usually react with even more hate. They just want to see things burn while accepting any possible collateral damage.
They wealthy will be buying islands (as big as Australia) get high on cocaine and do safari, shooting humans there as the ultimate fun [1]. The prey underestimates how the mind of predator works, and that's why it is a prey.
There 4 categories of people: the bandits, the smarts, the naives and the stupids. Bandits reign over the world, and in the past they needed the naives and the stupids to make them rich. In the age when enrichment can be automated they can see that naives and stupides are only contributing in shrinking their cake. They only need few smarts to keep their infrastructure alive so they could enjoy the planet for themselves.
The world consists of independent actors, at different scales, and lots of entropy. Any model like yours giving all the agency to 50 protagonists is a silly oversimplification.
It’s not that. It’s that I tried a bunch of experiments on which instructions worked best. “Speak clearly using simple language” lost too many details. “Be sure the objects that pronouns reference are clearly identified along with any context you might assume I have but I don’t” worked better, but I got tired of typing that in each time. So I looked up words to match that phrase and “deictic” fit perfectly. The results were pretty good, and so I’ve been using that prompt ever since.
I'm yet to find a developer who would agree that there is no good git UI, and would like to fix that situation together with me. 90% of those who know what got is dont care. The remaining 10% is split between command line fanatics and those who have no time to spare. One could imagine that 'LLM revolution' would have open the doors to unlimited prototyping but what we instead get is "hey ma i got a different angle at HN comments" at best
reply