First of all, companies have already outsourced all that they could a couple decades ago. Then when it comes to hiring in different countries, this gets extremely complicated due to taxes and regulations. While some remote-first companies can navigate this complexity (usually through some sort of HR as a service type company), most companies are not structured in such a way to feasibly hire people outside their incorporated area.

>companies have already outsourced all that they could a couple decades ago

Amateur armchair stuff. 9% YoY growth for decades.

https://truelist.co/blog/outsourcing-statistics/ (Graph 20)

This law passed during the Biden administration, but its implementation has been delayed repeatedly by the Trump administration.

> but it has been broken repeatedly by the Trump administration

fixed that for you

The bill itself outlines specifically how and why it can be delayed. That was violated in the very first "delay".

Turns out not having any penalty for the executive failing to apply the law is a mistake.

Who could have predicted this.

There is a penalty just congress has to enforce it.

The only penalty congress can enforce on the executive is cutting the budget of things the executive wants funded.

Also this only matters if the Fed is independent. If it’s not, the President can direct it to purchase unlimited treasury bonds, effectively printing unlimited money to fund any program it wants.

Paired with this administration’s assertion of impoundment powers and the pocket rescission, the Congress’s power of the purse is completely neutered in both directions. The executive can decline to spend whatever it doesn’t want to, and it can fund anything it does want.

Recklessly funding the government off of the Fed’s balance sheet will of course cause all sorts of nasty economic effects, but that’s exactly why you need to print money! So your massive immigration enforcement apparatus (newly full of ideological minions thanks to the current hiring surge) can go and assert powers of process-free expedited removal throughout the entire country (per DOJ memo from week 1).

So the economic consequences hardly matter: you simply deport whoever complains.

It turns out that if you won't impeach an executive on any principle whatsoever, you may as well grab the boot and put it on your own neck.

Maybe the best solution is to adopt a parliamentary system of government? With the executive formally subordinated to the legislature, it can’t spend money against the legislative majority’s wishes, because if it upsets the legislature, the legislature votes it out of power (commonly with no supermajority required, just a simple majority vote in the more numerous legislative house)

Absolutely. There's a reason the US didn't replicate its own structure when it set up governments in Europe and Japan.

or impeachment?

I mean I’m as anti-Trump as the next, but didn’t the bill say it could be delayed to finalize a sale to American owners?

You could make the case that this sale means the Trump admin actually didn’t break the rules here.

It said it could be delayed with some pretty specific parameters. Quoting the Congressional Research Service report on the bill:

"The President can grant a one-time extension of up to 90 additional days when a path to a qualified divestiture has been identified, there is evidence of 'significant' progress toward executing the divestiture, and there are legally binding agreements in place to enable the divestiture."

One could argue all day about whether or not there was an identified path or evidence of significant progress, but certainly there weren't legally binding agreements in place at any point, and the deadline has been extended far more than once.

Trump is ignoring the law. The DoJ has asserted that Trump can ignore the law because it would interfere with his duty to "take care of the national security and foreign affairs of the United States." It is unclear what, if any law, could not be ignored under this doctrine.

Only one extension was allowed.

People usually mean "end to end encryption" in these situations, and by adding a third "end" to the system, you bypass the whole point of end to end encryption.

My above example is end to end encryption compatible, it's just that you don't get to pick the end it might go to. However, the connections between ends are still encrypted. As such, it passes the technical mathematical definition (one end having a direct pipe to the second end, with nothing possibly in between), but not the philosophical one.

Governments have never cared about the encryption philosophy; only the math aspects and international risk - which, in this example, are technically satisfied.

I run out of things to read on the main page and check new for what’s up. It’s easier to do here due to a low submission volume.

Since nowadays we have many input sources, e.g. Twitter, newsletters, blog RSS feeds, etc. They're already overwhelming for me. Browsing the "newest" feed has a very low signal-to-noise ratio.

That description could match nearly any tech company in the Bay Area or Seattle and everything along the coast.

In common parlance, it means overly right wing.

That must be where Onlyfans was inspired to emulate the business model.

The exemption doesn't apply to performance artists

More like chastity auctions, am I right?

I imagine the ICEBlock author automatically assumed that Micah Lee was some pro-ICE rando without looking into him at all, further proving the blog post title correct.

It’s not a niche topic, but anything to do with Iran tends to censor the bad things going on there.

That would be the Apache Attic: https://attic.apache.org/