> They are all crying for the audience, the losers.
There is an opinion that making them (a big business, and overseas players too), crying for audience is a way to make them loyal to a regime. So they come to the audience, they kiss the ring, they get some preference, and the regime becomes even stronger. I'd not name Trump crazy as some do, but simply a person presenting and promoting the interests of a certain entity. I won't name my guesses about the possible entity.
I would love it if you would. I can't promise how it will be viewed in this space but I find the best way to educate myself is to be wrong on the internet. :)
Is there a way I could let some CI service like Travis CI to ONLY publish the packages to this GitHub Package Registry? ONLY means I don't want to expose the entire GitHub account to Travis CI but allow only publishing to the registry. So if the GitHub key/access-token leaks somehow the possible damage would be limited by registry publishing scope. So something like scoped access tokens.
Yes. They showed in the demo that there will be a new scope for read/publish packages. So you can create a personal access token for Travis with only that scope.
That's very interesting! Stopped paying attention after Angular 2 was released... will take a look, thanks for the info!
Edit: It looks like the goals are a bit different with Angular's focus on Typescript (Svelte let's you do this but is not entirely focused on Typescript). Also not sure if Angular's compiler supports CSS compilation.
- Is speed comparison going to include Angular with Ivy renderer enabled (and probably OnPush change detection strategy enabled)? It's also AOT rendering stuff that doesn't use virtual DOM.
- There is a lot of static code analyzing tools, like linters, that work with separate JS/CSS/HTML files. Does Svelte have to adapt all those tools in order to make them properly work with a single file component (.svelte file)?
- I believe enabling first-class TypeScipt support would bring more sanity to Svelte-based development.
There is an opinion that making them (a big business, and overseas players too), crying for audience is a way to make them loyal to a regime. So they come to the audience, they kiss the ring, they get some preference, and the regime becomes even stronger. I'd not name Trump crazy as some do, but simply a person presenting and promoting the interests of a certain entity. I won't name my guesses about the possible entity.