That's blowing your mind because the currently implicitly or mindlessly acknowledged understanding by the majority of people is that today is the peak of human's evolution. Majority thinks that they inherently and collectively know everything better in relation to what our ancestors knew, especially compared to those thousands of years ago. But how do you really know. Because they had no iPhones and cars? Development of technical tools, yeah there we _might_ well be on the peak, but that doesn't really cover all aspects of actually _understanding_ our earth and the universe.
We are on the natural rise after a natural ice period. Just check long term temperature curves and stop looking short term, making it look like there has ever been the same average temperature on earth.
We've got satellites that can measure the inflow and outflow of radiation and see an imbalance.
We've got spectrographs that can look at that radiation to see which radiation is not balanced. We can see that what is happening is radiation coming in at wavelengths that the atmosphere doesn't block heats things which reradiate much of that energy as infrared which the atmosphere blocks.
Thanks to spectroscopy we know that it is CO₂ in the atmosphere that is largely responsible for this blocking.
We know that the increase in CO₂ levels over the last couple of hundred years is largely from fossil fuels rather than things like decaying vegetation, forest fires, animal respiration and flatulence, or volcanic gases because of isotope ratios in atmospheric CO₂.
CO₂ from living things or recently living things contains ¹⁴C. CO₂ from fossil fuels and volcanoes does not contain ¹⁴C. CO₂ from volcanoes contains a higher ratio of ¹³C to ¹²C than the ratio in atmospheric CO₂. CO₂ from fossil fuels contains a lower ratio of ¹³C to ¹²C than the ratio in atmospheric CO₂.
That allows scientists to look at the isotope ratios in the atmosphere and figure out how much of the CO₂ there came from fossil fuels and how much came from volcanoes. The result is that most of the increase is from fossil fuels.
As a sanity check that result also matches well with the amount of CO₂ that we'd expect to have been released based on the amount of known fossil fuel use.
"Now that we have succeeded in capturing the natural climate variability, we can see that the projected anthropogenic warming will be much greater than that.”
That does not seem to support your claim of "natural rise".
"A continuous record of the past 66 million years shows natural climate variability due to changes in Earth’s orbit around the sun is much smaller than projected future warming due to greenhouse gas emissions."
“Now that we have succeeded in capturing the natural climate variability, we can see that the projected anthropogenic warming will be much greater than that.”
"For the past 3 million years, Earth’s climate has been in an Icehouse state characterized by alternating glacial and interglacial periods. Modern humans evolved during this time, but greenhouse gas emissions and other human activities are now driving the planet toward the Warmhouse and Hothouse climate states not seen since the Eocene epoch, which ended about 34 million years ago."
Please read the article you're linking. Unless this is an awkwardly executed joke that I'm missing?
The +1.5°C cannot be attributed to the natural transition from an ice age. It is happening way too fast compared to the thousands of years the Milankovitch cycle operates on. Also, you're conveniently ignoring the fact that, if anything, the climate should be getting cooler, not hotter, as we are entering an ice age, not exiting one[1].
That mammals were not in existence for the larger part of that very warm period. So the fact that life existed through it has little bearing on human civilization thriving through a similar one, as parent seemed to imply.
Let's, I am not afraid of the earth getting much warmer, I see it as mostly fear mongering. If it's really getting _that_ hot that we mammals can't survive, then let that be it. There's the notorious idea of some humans that we can control everything. Let's continue keeping the earth a clean, healthy space, let's stop producing so much waste, let's clean the water, I am all in. But to believe that we are heating up the earth, I'm glad that not all agree to that nonsense.
> But to believe that we are heating up the earth, I'm glad that not all agree to that nonsense.
We are not heating up the earth.
The sun is heating up the earth.
That's occurring as we are adding 11 billion tonnes per year of additional insulation to the atmosphere. That's like throwing more blankets on the bed, trapping more heat.
This is well documented. The gas properties are understood and can be demonstrated in science labs to children. The gas sources are well understood and derive from documented fossil fuel extraction and confirmed by both isotope records and now by orbiting satellites.
I'm not sure if this link is intended to contradict or reinforce the image from the previous link. The text of that link indicates that the research concluded that the Earth is currently much warmer than it ought to be given known natural processes.
The Vue/Angular demo files make use of `new Proxy()`. To the devs knowing these frameworks: is that best practice, or asked differently, are these representative examples?
I think the author is trying to briefly show how internals of these frameworks are designed.
My framework of choice is Angular and the example is somewhat accurate, even if it shows just a small slice of the system.
Indeed Angular components start off with a compilation step (which doesn't have to be done entirely at runtime) and there's a system in place to react to data changes and events in the template - can't confirm whether it's using Proxies though.
But there's also a whole change detection system which reacts to event listeners firing, HTTP requests, timeouts etc. and decides which components to update and how.
Nowadays there are also signals, which add another layer on top of all that.
Overall Angular's internals are a massively complicated beast and few people have a good grasp of them (I've met some - would not recommend doing what they were doing). Net effect is that its development as a framework is slow. Personally I see it as a feature.
Vue switched to proxies in v3. They haven’t had great browser support for a very long time, and if I remember correctly, polyfilling them was difficult.
Yeah Vue 2 used object getters and setters, and there were a few tricky caveats. For example, setting an array item using an index wouldn't trigger the setters (e.g. `myArray[0] = ''`). You had to remember these edge cases and use `Vue.set` [1]. Proxies made everything so much simpler, but they can't really be polyfilled at all, because they require deep JS engine integration (e.g. to register a callback that gets notified whenever a property is added to an object).
Yeah, the Vue-like I made (other comment) was my second attempt at it and this time using just Proxy to simplify things. The first time I had tried to do it as Vue did previously with defineProperty but it was a damn mess to try to support arrays,etc and honestly the code was never stable (and using Vue V2 you can also run into a few edge-cases like missing properties missing reactivity).
I have an old MacBook Air that my daughter uses for school; it doesn’t support the evergreen version of MacOS/Safari, or Firefox or Chrome. I think Proxies have been around long enough that they are supported…but I’m waiting for the day that she can no longer use a browser on that machine, at which point I’ll either have to buy her a new one, or install some flavor of Linux. It’s a shame because the computer itself is totally serviceable!
Hey, elinks still works just fine inside tmux over an ssh connection. Less hassle than getting the VPN running correctly if I just want to read a company intranet wiki page.
"CrowdStrike determined in June 2016 that Russian agents had broken into the committee’s network and stolen emails that were subsequently published by WikiLeaks. Its findings were confirmed by FBI investigators, with whom it later shared the forensic evidence."
> [Trump]: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it.
Believe it or not, there are websites that have real things posted. This is honestly my biggest shock that OpenAI thought Reddit of all places is a trustworthy source for knowledge.
It’s genuinely concerning to me how many people replied with thinking reddit is the gospel for factual information.
Reddit, while it has some niche communities with tribal info and knowledge, is FULL of spam, bots, companies masquerading as users, etc etc etc. If people are truly relying on reddit as a source of truth (which OpenAI is now being influenced by), then the world is just going to be amplify all the spam that already exists
