I'm not sure if this is saying people were given a task and the option to consult an AI. When they did they were influenced by its answer.
Which is kind of duh? Of course. They have some cool language like calling the AI system 3 and calling taking advice 'cognitive surrender' but I'm not sure how this differs from asking your mate Bob and taking his advice?
That's one possible interpretation. Another possible one is people don't want to see HN become Trump, Trump, Trump and maybe some other story like the rest of the news.
>36,500 killed in 400 cities... Our Editorial Board has now obtained more detailed information provided by the IRGC Intelligence Organization to the Supreme National Security Council.
There are zero verified sources of any mass killings by the Iranian government. In fact all evidence points to Mossad agents committing the mass killings of Iranian government officials as caught on video, including the wrestler that was just executed for killing a police officer with a machete, on video.
Also I guess they could put a large battery at the charging station so it can take say a steady 200kw from the grid and be able to kick out 1500kw for ten minutes occasionally. That could also charge from cheap off peak electricity.
This is what everyone is already doing, even for relatively small and slow dispensers.
It's simply cheaper to have on-site batteries. It makes installation work with a smaller connection to the grid, and makes it possible to install chargers in more places without upgrading the grid connection.
Energy arbitrage is profitable on its own, so EV charging stations are almost just an excuse to get some land and a grid connection for more batteries.
Supercaps are viable for this sort of short term charge and discharge. The much maligned donut labs is suspected to be a license built Nordic hybrid supercap battery model
Plus the Japanese beating the British so badly all over Southeast Asia. This gave a lot of momentum to independence in Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand and eventually India.
The article seems a bit silly. Andressen has said he's not introspective, I guess as in "the active, conscious examination of one’s own mental, emotional, and psychological processes". The article jumps from not thinking about your processes to "lacking conscious experiences altogether" which is quite different.
Which is kind of duh? Of course. They have some cool language like calling the AI system 3 and calling taking advice 'cognitive surrender' but I'm not sure how this differs from asking your mate Bob and taking his advice?
reply