> Not a noise standard, which would make sense. A speed limit.
Is enforcing a perceived noise, or even a measured decibel limit on the ground even realistic? It would be difficult to investigate reported infractions unless they're consistently coming from a scheduled route, because the noise level on the ground depends on more than just the plane. "Supersonic jets that don't have a lot of headroom on the noise limits in a dry, flat desert shouldn't fly supersonic through this area because the the land underneath is shaped like a parabola and it's very humid." is much more difficult for a pilot to manage and a regulation body to enforce than "Don't fly faster than this airspeed." especially when the effect was the same back when the bill was introduced.
CloudFlare's Universal SSL certificates used to be shared between multiple unrelated accounts by SAN stuffing, so back then they definitely wouldn't have given out the private key. I think this may have changed since I last saw a CloudFlare certificate with >100 SANs for various unrelated sites on a client's certificate around 3 years ago. The certificate from the post is not shared, and I can't find any other Universal SSL certificates that are shared now. This support article still suggests they're shared, however [0].
They likely didn't give clients the private keys before simply to save costs by reducing the number of certificates they had to issue. Now that they're not sharing certificates, it's probably just a way to extract a little more money from customers.
A push button normally closed momentary switch would be pretty slick too. Also it would probably be best to put it on the ground wire. Car radios will have at least two power wires, one for constant power (which keeps the clock set, and favourite stations programmed), and one switched accessory power to command it on.
Then again, a new $30 radio would be slicker still.
I took up bouldering around 2 years ago, despite my fear of heights. I've managed it by sticking exclusively to gyms, and staying well within my limits. What also helps is the gym I started at had a safety orientation that all climbers had to go through before they'd be allowed on the walls. The most important part of this was how to fall correctly.
The gym I frequent also has a great variety of route difficulties and heights (~3m to ~7m), so it really helped me move up slowly along with my comfort level. As for the amount of times I fall, it's far less than I expected, and I've never felt unsafe, even while falling.
They mention Cellebrite because they share specific stats on how much data they can copy off a device in a given time. It's essentially used as a source for the end of the paragraph where they explain why it matters that CBP had their phones for that period.
Is the electric mini cheaper than the standard 3 door hatch? The only price points I'm seeing are £16195 for petrol [1] and £24400 after UK incentives for the BEV [2].
I was going to mention that the one that has broken earth's orbit is the wrong vehicle and is not a first generation Tesla Roadster, but then I realised the repair woes are likely to be even worse for second generation Roadster owners. They're not likely to be produced in significantly more volume, and they're made totally in house, not based on a Lotus platform like the last one.
I would love to know what they classify as a daily active user. My expectation would be someone who sends or receives a message, but I would never have expected the numbers to be so high. Maybe they're counting everyone who signs into their O365 account who has a Teams subscription.
More likely anyone who have an active O365 subscription that includes teams even if they only have that subscription because thats the only way MS is selling access to the traditional desktop office application that they need for some decade old workflow.
While the press have been blinded by MS's nonsense "we L..... Linux" campaign nobody seams to have noticed that their office department is playing the same dirty games MS got fined over a decade ago in forcing every office user to obtain a O365 subscription and putting a tremendeous amount a presure on their SME customers to obtain the full O365 stack which include teams(which MS insists is replacing skype for business).
Remember also that MS marketing is almost 110% tailored to the now aging set of SME admins that entered the market doing the transition from big iron to winNT networks in the 90ies and who depend on MS Certified courses and books for all of their formal IT training and that SME market where those Teams deployments comes from, if you have an Teams subscription and a "i only know the MS stack" mindset you are not going to deploy stack no matter how much more your users prefer it to Teams.
And the "We love linux on Azure" marketing is exactly that narrow, the same day it was announced MS killed of any feature they ever had that made it easier to integrate Linux* into wintel networks, making it clear to all but the clueless that it's only about headless linux guest running comodity web frameworks running inside azure or hyperV then any change in MS attitude towards competitors and that was forced on them by the fact that the webdev market was/is dominated by OSX clients and linux servers.
*SFU and RFC2307 support was dropped along with the teams/skype clients for linux the same week they started raving about linux CLI's being usable from windows clients.
Wood gas is mainly hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Even a small leak into the passenger compartment could be deadly, especially if it was filtered well enough to be odourless and the occupants don't notice quickly.
The argument is that if you are buying a licence, the retailer is obligated to tell you you're buying a licence. Current advertising, shopping, and checkout flows instead communicate that you are buying an eBook.
Is enforcing a perceived noise, or even a measured decibel limit on the ground even realistic? It would be difficult to investigate reported infractions unless they're consistently coming from a scheduled route, because the noise level on the ground depends on more than just the plane. "Supersonic jets that don't have a lot of headroom on the noise limits in a dry, flat desert shouldn't fly supersonic through this area because the the land underneath is shaped like a parabola and it's very humid." is much more difficult for a pilot to manage and a regulation body to enforce than "Don't fly faster than this airspeed." especially when the effect was the same back when the bill was introduced.