Are you asking because you think those examples don't exist, and if so, are open to someone showing you they do?
If you're open to someone showing you they do, would you accept their judgement in that regard, or would you want to apply your own judgement of their judgement?
More of the first - I imagine some example(s) exist. Though without finding/seeing even one of them, it's hard to think there's more than few isolated incidents.
I'm not too clear on what you were asking regarding judgment part?
Pretty much every criminal says they've learned more crime/techniques and could build their "network" in prison. So more prisoners would likely have effect of continuing/promoting crime.
Anyway - no birth control method (except abstaining) is 100%, even when you stack multiple different ways it can happen.
And some methods of birth control - like pill for woman and vasectomy for guys - can mess you up long term.
Women describe getting off the pill like completely changing their taste/smell senses, even brain/thinking ...etc (which sounds similar to what happens in/after pregnancy). When they give it to teenage girls (to "fix" their irregular cycle) they often gain weight..
And while vasectomy could be reversed, it's not guaranteed it would work.
^ There's a reason people recommend using two methods of birth control at any given time, but even then—freak accidents happen. Four nines isn't 0% :P
Also worth noting that there are about a million birth control pills on the market with different side effects... and different levels of efficacy. Progestin-only pills are popular because people tend to tolerate them well, but they're notably less effective than pills with estradiol in them. Sometimes that's a worthwhile trade-off!
They used the account only to announce disruptions - and didn't lock comments/replies.
So obviously on some of those posts you would see replies from people annoyed by specific disruptions.
The weird thing is that you actually need to spend time to find any replies - as most announcements didn't have replies.
And those I found only reached the "sarcastically formed hypothetical question". And still often being on point - e.g. why are there no fallback buses to cover tram/metro disruptions.
Considering all that - it seems "constant hateful messages" is at least a bit exaggerated.
I've subconsciously ruled out DMs - so thanks for pointing out.
That's said, GVBs announcement was mentioning lack of supervision/moderation, and they continue to use WhatsApp - so I don't think it was Twitter/X DMs but actual replies.
And yeah you can simply set who can reply for each post on X - e.g. only mentioned users, so for their announcements basically no one.
And while there's obviously a segment of X users that are the kind you imagine also trolls on 4chan - reporting posts/replies with racism/hate/etc usually results in their temporary or even permanent ban.
With one kid just becoming a teen and other kid being half the age - I'm somewhat biased.
I know a dozens of early teens (friends/classmates of my kid, kids of friends/colleagues ...etc) that are (still) playing Roblox.
I even know one of those older teens (friends kid) that is earning enough money from Roblox games - that it doesn't make sense for him to do a typical Dutch teenager job of stocking shelves in stores/markets.
From ages 6/7 and higher it's common for kids to say to each other "Don't need toy type of birthday present as I would prefer Roblox (or once they are a bit older Fortnite or other similar) gift card".
More than once our kid got so many that we had to "throttle" their "use" over weeks/months.
Anyway - yeah developers getting only 30% and Roblox keeping 70%, especially with all the fuss about the likes of Apple/Google/Unity getting into trouble for 70/30 split the other way - doesn't make sense.
Sure - there are bigger operational costs for Roblox actually running game servers (instead of just the store) - though not that much bigger, right?
Similar experience when I tried using DuckDuckGo as default on recently bought Android phone.
I'm all in for privacy - and actively dislike many of Google/YouTube moves (which seem intentional part of plan and not so much accidental or with technical reasons) - e.g.:
YouTube doesn't allow parents to limit their young kids to only whitelisted channels ...
Even worse, if you block YouTube.com domain - kid can't sign into school account (Google classroom stuff) because signing into anything Google actually goes through something like accounts.youtube.com.
And yet after 20th or 30th time when I was not finding things though DDG and manually typing "google.com" to do a search there (browser and other android search boxes were defaulting to DDG).
I just switched default browser and search engine back to Google :(
This. And it actually doesn't even need to be done through SMTP.
MMS being basically SMS with a link/url to where the phone fetches multimedia part from - it could also be sent via older EMI-UCP (that was originally used for pagers).
At some point pre 2010 (when I worked in Routo Messaging - now called Telesign) we also got an SS7 connection - so we could finally start doing stuff like a real mobile operator/provider.
Until 2010 I worked for Route Messaging (now they are called Telesign) on internal systems as well as integrations with mobile operators and other "messaging brokers" around the world.
MMS was indeed order of magnitude more expensive than SMS and several orders of magnitude less used.
Reasoning for such high prices was more about mobile internet/data back then being really expensive "1G" - and MMS was (still is I guess) using mobile data to send/receive "multimedia messages".
At this point I expect that cost of MMS is more about maintaining legacy systems/servers for that.
Although in something like 2008/2009 integrating through legacy SMS protocols (those previously used by beepers/pagers) was cheaper than through modern protocols. Some operators had hardware boxes supporting those that were already paid off long time ago.
Being surrounded by "yes" people can only get you so far.
Although it probably gets you further than the opposite extreme where everyone disagrees all the time.
Personally having such info (critical reviews on previous employers) for a candidate, would be close to already having their answer for
"Tell me about a time you had a challenge/problem/conflict at work" type of interview questions.
Worst I found are tweets about drivers that don't pick up travelers from a stop being called "jerks".