Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sto11z's commentslogin

You are thinking about it wrong, output is not symmetrical to input to have a type, it's a container for content that updates while you're using the page.


That is not true, the phrase is non-native brits, and that is very different to what you wrote.


Do you really think he's complaining about the white Aussie bartender who comes over here?


Maybe not Aussie bartender but even a lot of typically 'white' Europeans have very different cultures than English and Australian. For example when it comes when it comes to punctuality or queuing. Even stuff like how contracts are treated can be very different depending on the culture. DHH is Dutch and maybe closer to English culture than Italian/Spanish/French.

EDIT: removed unnecessary trailing inflammatory comment


"Do you really think he's complaining about the white Aussie bartender who comes over here?"

-> Theres little complaint about the "white" Ausie bartender, BECAUSE he probably speaks great English, came there legally, isn't consuming wellfare resources, isn't advocating for Sharia law, and might even end up going back to Ausie land.

It's not about *skin color*, it is about culture/crime/wellfare resources and legal double standards.

If an Ausie entered the UK illegally, he would be deported. If an Ausie committed a crime, he goes to jail and/or deported. With these other people, they enter illegally but then get placed in tax payer funded hotels and politicians conspire with police to cover up their crimes (see the rape gang scandals) and they literaly arrested the victims.

At one point there were plenty of complaints when *too many Polish white dudes* rocked up in the UK and competed for jobs and didn't always speak good English.

Not about race - it is about Language, culture, job competition, crime rates, wellfare resources, values (sharia-law / treatment of women), social integration vs enclaves.

And only when it involves so many millions of people comming in that it rapidly alters the local culture. (or shifts votes! or whatever other thing people care about - overwhelming of infrastructure / housing availability)

Why is DHH a racist for sympathising with some Britts whom are unhappy with the 60% cultural transformation that is occuring in London?

You are reading between the lines to hastily conclude that DHH is a racist. You need more than just "he wasn't complaining about white Ausie bartenders".

Quote me an actual paragraph or sentence where DHH says he dislikes anyone because of their race ? Or stop calling people racists without hard proof. The tone of that DDH London article seems quite radical. But tone is not enough to indict.


Literally none of what you have said is true. Stop reading the Daily Mail / watching Fox News and go do some research.

It isn't my job to give you a point by point rebuttal of all the racist talking points you've regurgitated.


Calling people racist is cheap. I literally just explained how people can have legitimate concerns about illegal migrants entering in large numbers, concerns which are COMPLETELY UNRELATED to skin color, and all you do is call these things racist talking points.


[flagged]


He says "non-native brits" - but what does he actually link to?

Come on, this isn't hard.


He also complains that he, a non-brit, doesn't want to live in London because it has non-brits living there. He's a racist, plain and simple.


He says "non-native brits" and says there are "about a third" and links to a page showing 36% "White British"[0] (note: explicitly excluding non-white british)

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45303111


Can you define that term?


he excels in this kind of dog whistling. it confuses people who were born yesterday, but it is loud and clear to people who agree with him or are the intended victims.


Yeah I came here to say this, if the author somehow understood that this is cheering for starving children, I believe he has some comperhension issues.


The ideology of the author needs starving children to survive. Once children stop starving, the author’s ideology is no longer useful and dies.


I tried 3 betas of ios and then sold my iPhone and bought a Pixel, that's how disappointed I was from what I saw.


I tried transitioning to FF from Chrome several times, but it just feels so unresonsive and slow in comparison. I really wanted to, but ultimately couldn't.

On a side note: You can manually install uBlock and just continue using it:

- Enter chrome://flags in chrome’s URL input

- Search for ‘Allow legacy extension manifest versions’

- Enable it and relaunch browser

- Download the latest zip file of uBlock version from github: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases

- Under Assets, download the chromium zip and extract it

- Open the extension page in chrome, click the Load Unpacked button on top left side load (enable Developer Mode in the top right if it doesn't appear), then select the extracted folder.


> You can manually install uBlock and just continue using it

Only with Chrome 138 and lower. Chrome 139 will not support Manifest V2 anymore.

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate...

Seriously, use Firefox if you want to use uBlock Origin.


Oh! :/


FWIW uBlock Origin Lite (the MV3 version of uBlock Origin) seems pretty much just as good, at least to me.

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/...

I don't use a ton of custom filters or rulesets though, so YMMV.



For what it's worth, rudimentary (but persistent) css-based filters with a nifty element picker was implemented two weeks ago:

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commit/0b0294af4f

It's great, and it still even works permissionless!


Understandable. I tried moving from Firefox to Chrome but I couldn't. Pages are so slow to load and there are adds everywhere.


Right there with you. I cannot understand how people manage to use Chrome without an ad-blocker. It's just so slow and makes my laptop heat up and run out of memory...


I'm curious what would make you even want to try with all the shenanigans Google has been up to. It seems obvious that its a bad idea.


I wanted to see just how bad is raw Chrome experience on Android. I've learned my lesson.


What parts felt unresponsive and slow?


I get super annoyed by this but on iOS. And the fact that you need to press several times to actually turn it off instead of 'pause' from using it makes it even worse :@


It definitely is annoying. I’m sure they’ve made it for Find My to work most of the time. I wouldn’t mind bluetooth being on all the time but if you have AirTag nearby it drains the battery pretty aggressively.


I wrote a shortcut that checks the input device and if its not connected to anything to hard-off bluetooth


The amount of carbon dioxide you exhale coincides with the metabolic process in your body, not the amount of oxygen you inhale. Stop trying to 'hack' the metabolism, just eat less.


Apple doesn't have a gaming division. Why would they be interested in acquiring Blizzard?


That’s why i included the paranthesis “(or probably could have) happen(ed)”.

That said, they do have a gaming service: https://www.apple.com/apple-arcade/


Apple Arcade is for casual games that have to work on all of Apple's form factors (minus the watch, thankfully). I've tried it out twice. It is, with very few exceptions, in a completely different category from PC gaming because most people access it through a touchscreen. It's like comparing a PS5 and a Switch, except that Apple Arcade is not nearly as polished as the Switch.

My impression is also that Apple Arcade is already pushing the limits of how much Apple's management wants to touch gaming.


Apple has started to sink hundreds of millions into Apple Arcade the past couple years.

Big AAA titles take several years to produce and I doubt Apple will allow half-baked games to launch. That means we won't be seeing those games start to launch until 2023-2024.

Apple is definitely working on a VR headset. They've bought out 4-5 VR companies already. There were rumors of a 2022 launch, but 2023 matches up much better with their game studio launch dates.

That subscription is a HUGE moneymaker (that's how WoW made Blizzard so much money). Most serious gamers play 1-2 games for a couple of years. Traditional studios charge $60 (less for sales) and then release one $20-30 DLC per year. That gives them $120 over two years at the very best (though most players won't bother with DLC). Apple gets $80 per year unconditionally. Moreover, this will get casual gamers in addition to hardcore ones.

Now that Apple runs everything on M1 and even the slowest M1 chips have better GPUs than most Wintel systems, Apple can sell games to everyone. Because everything is using the same architecture (same CPU and same GPU across the board), their devs save a ton of time and money developing and optimizing which means their total time to deliver and cost to deliver is much lower.

I suspect that MS sees this as an extremely serious threat. They need to do everything they can to leverage xbox pass and compete.


No matter how much money you throw at the current Apple Arcade, most people will play the game on a 5" touch screen. If you want to target living room gamers with a gamepad, the same game has to work on an Apple TV that struggles to render 3D scenes at 4K (probably until an M2 version comes out?). I think it's just going to be a baseline of games for people/families who have Apple One, like how Solitaire and Minesweeper came with Windows.

If Apple goes all-in on VR, the whole VR market will benefit from greater public acceptance. But at the very best I predict it'll be like the Nintendo Wii: a few games that are extremely popular, and then it gets old.

Which is a shame because I agree that Apple is in a great position to enter the gaming market. Imagine what Nintendo could do with powerful hardware in so many hands! But by the same logic, Apple should have crushed Spotify long ago, given its mile-wide lead with the iTunes Store, and yet the nicest thing I have heard about Apple Music is that it works with other Apple stuff. I honestly don't think Apple's management understands entertainment.


You don't have to render identically. A 720p phone and a 4k TV are quite different.

An average steam gamer has a 3-5 TFLOP 1060 rendering 1080p with a quad-core intel at 2.5GHz. A 6-core A15 (little cores are about as fast per clock as Zen 1) with a 1.3-1.5 TFLOP GPU comes quite close. If Apple wanted, they could add a magnetic dock with controls and extra battery for serious gamers too.

For something like the Apple TV (A12 isn't a slouch though no 4K gaming machine) they could offer streaming with remote rendering.

I suspect the launch 4+4 CPU with 32 or even 64-core GPU. They should sell that in a mac mini sized console with a wireless VR headset. That said, Oculus Quest 2 is quite popular and it has a Qualcomm 865 which is much slower than that A12 let alone the A15. They could definitely stomp the Ques 2 with an A15-based device and could go much farther with a M1/M2 chip.


> You don't have to render identically. A 720p phone and a 4k TV are quite different.

Yes, but that's kind of the problem. The 720p phone has a lot of horsepower per pixel, but is crippled by touch controls. The Apple TV is _slower_ on a larger screen, with yet another frustrating input situation because Apple didn't put a gamepad in the package. (They don't even make gamepads! The MFi ones I bought were pure junk.) I can't imagine a more hostile environment to develop AAA games for.


A year back or so there were articles claiming that apple has stopped all development of content rich games, aiming at quick addictive ones instead. They released studios making the former from contracts.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-30/apple-can...


You would be shocked to know Apple was days late to buying Bungie, creator of Halo.


They was a way different time and a different Apple.


Exactly. MS has Xbox and has been buying up a lot of Game studios as well. Blizzard makes sense for them to buy; Apple doesn’t seem to be contending…


To start a gaming division with widely known titles already onboard.


What else are people going to do with their $3,000 Apple Goggles?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: