Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sschueller's commentslogin

I would be interested to know how these are made on a technical level. Is it a combination of several tools and are they local or some service (I would think LEGO minifigs would trigger some copyright issue)? I also assume you need to do certain things to keep the consistency and somehow sync the music with the video?

Yet somehow the US did manage to get power to most places...

The thing with fiber is that it can go so much longer than copper without any active components. It is also very future proof, you won't be pulling it out of the ground/off the pole for at least 50 years if not longer.

If size is such an issue, how did you get power?


> Yet somehow the US did manage to get power to most places...

You're not conflating 2 different infrastructure processes and ignoring the one took decades, are you? This is like saying "The US has built a road infrastructure why can't it do all light rails?"

The irony in your comment is that it government intervention, which is the opposite of a free market.


Who said free market? Swisscom is 51% government. A government-ish entity is IMHO the most efficient way to do this.

You can't have 2 road networks, highway systems, or railway networks. You can have, but it is pointless to, 2 water systems or 2 electric grids. Or fire brigades, or police. (criminal, not mall cops) Same applies for fibre in the ground. "Free market" doesn't work when you can't effectively compete.


There was that whole spiel of Elon and Trump going to Fort Knox to see if the gold was still there, What ever happened to that?

I’m pretty sure Trump thought or heard mention of Minchin (first Trump Treasury Secretary) visit to Fort Knox in 2017 recent to that comment and just blurted out the first thing that came to his mind - like most of his off the cuff remarks, it doesn’t make any sense on close examination but appeals to MAGA supporters.

The doesn’t answer the question.

Like most off the cuff Trump remarks - it made headlines for a while but nothing came of it, it’s not in Project 2025 and Musk fell out of favor with Trump for whatever reason. The combo of Musk and Trump was just dry kindling for the forest fire of baseless conspiracy theories with no founding in reality - like “omg, government incompetence lost the gold, Biden stole the gold after Trump didn’t lose in 2020” since Minchin told Trump what he saw in 2017 and Minchin posted interior photos of Knox with his wife at the time on social media. Since it disappeared from news after the remark and there is no one in current Trump admin who would pass up an opportunity for internet karma, a reasonable person can conclude it was just another bit of flooding the zone with information - credit where credit is due - several strategies executed by Trump that were outlined in Jacques Ellul seminal book - Propaganda.

The article is not AI slop.

I spent 4 days on it and the video I made to go along with it with me speaking every word. The video has no AI, it is all stock video and audio footage which I pain stackenly stiched together in DaVinci Resolve.

I used AI to spell check and fix my ESL grammer in the article. Initially I also generated a number of unnecessary AI images which I removed again. I only left the ones that explain certain things like the p2p model.


I heard that argument when I got 28.8k modem back in the day when that was quite uncommon.

Yes, that is sadly still the case but the expansion of the fiber build out is now rapidly moving forward. By 2030 +90% will have fiber

https://www.swisscom.ch/en/about/news/2024/02/08-weniger-kup...


That's actually terrible. The UK (which has been a laggard in FTTH in Europe until very recently) is at 84% FTTH coverage already.

Agreed but I didn't want to just take random images from the web that I don't have the rights too and I my artistic skills are not good enough.

You can search for Creative Commons images on Google. Though, honestly, a longform piece would've been much better than the glitchy face horror show that is that "fiber-laying in Germany" image, which is a composite of hundreds of thousands of random images from all sorts of places!

You could just not generate extra images that aren't relevant to the article. I like the charts and diagrams even when they're AI, because they serve a purpose. But the extra images for flair or whatever are completely pointless and even annoying.

I would go a little further (and apologies for being rather blunt): but I find the over-use of irrelevant images to be rather insulting, as if I am unable to maintain focus on an article, without the frequent shiny object.

I wouldn't necessarily call that further. The images I like are relevant because they visually explain things that are helpful. The images I don't like are irrelevant because they serve no purpose other than to Be Images for no good reason.

Ok thanks. I will keep that in mind for my next post.

Please ignore them, the images definitely helped understand the issue better. Don't anchor on a couple of grouchy hn posters.

Hey there were a lot more before the feedback, the irrelevant ones have been removed[0]. The remaining images in the article are good :)

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652734


Slop? I wrote this myself over the last 4 days.

[edit] Since people really hate the AI images, I have removed all of the ones not relevant to the article. As soon as the github action is through it will be deployed.


The article was well written, really enjoyed it and I learned something as a Swiss citizen using this outlet every day! But I agree with the other commenters, I would replace the AI generated images with something else, they drag drown the articles credibility IMO

I would get rid of just the irrelevant images and leave the others. There are a few that are actually helpful.

Your article has so many bad premises it might have gone better with AI

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654841


The AI-generated images really hurt the article. I found myself skipping everything except for the charts/diagrams.

Would you prefer a large wall of text? If that is what people rather have I would leave them out next time. I find it easier to read with images in between the text but I agree, it would be better if the images where not AI.

Again like I said, I don't mind the charts and diagrams but I don't like the random extras.

First image: extra. "The Paradox" section header: extra. "The Natural Monopoly" section header: sort of helpful. "The German Model" and "The American Model" headers: also sort of helpful. Also, the chart of monopoly territories is definitely helpful. But then after that, the "monopoly power" image is complete slop. "The Swiss Model" header is sort of helpful. The following couple of photos are also helpful! Speedtest result is helpful. But then the image after that is kind of pointless. "The Oversight" header is kind of pointless. The photo after that is kind of helpful. "The Answer" header I can't really make sense of and I'd lean more towards not helpful.


Thank you for your feedback. I have adjust the article now.

Thank you, this is a lot better!


Edit: I'm wrong! Yoink!

this is not true

Uh, what? They very much did not.

Retracted. Not sure where I heard that. Likely confused with Sweden

Does anyone know a good alternate project that works similarly (share multipple LLMs across a set of users)? LiteLLM has been getting worse and trying to get me to upgrade to a paid version. I also had issues with creating tokens for other users etc.

If you're talking about their proxy offering, I had this exact same issue and switched to Portkey. I just use their free plan and don't care about the logs (I log separately on my own). It's way faster (probably cause their code isn't garbage like the LiteLLM code - they had a 5K+ line Python file with all their important code in it the last time I checked).

I just found https://github.com/jasmedia/InferXgate which looks interesting although quite new and not supporting so many providers.

Bifrost is the only real alternative I'm aware of https://github.com/maximhq/bifrost

Virtual Keys is an Enterprise feature. I am not going to pay for something like this in order to provide my family access to all my models. I can do without cost control (although it would be nice) but I need for users to be able to generate a key and us this key to access all the models I provide.

I just deployed it to test it out and this is FALSE. I was able to create Virtual Keys on the free version with no issues.

Please do a double take on the facts, you might falsely deter people.


I don’t believe it is an enterprise feature. I did some testing on Bifrost just last month on a free open source instance and was able to set up virtual keys.

We have tried reaching out to their sales multiple times but never get a response.

agentgateway.dev is one I have been working on that is worth a look if you are using the proxy side of LiteLLM. It's open source part of the Linux foundation.

github.com/mozilla-ai/any-llm :)

pydantic-ai

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: