Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | smusamashah's commentslogin

And they are also using humans as shield? Is it only the enemies of Israel that use human shields or do criminals/terrorists in Israel (if there is such a thing) or any other country do that too?

I'm not sure how we got to the human shield conversation but Hezbollah is firing from within civilian areas if that's the question: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-891166

As to what's common between Hezbollah and Hamas and Iran in the way they treat their civilians I will leave that as an exercise to the reader.


The traveller tree looked the most interesting, like a peacock's feather.

https://www.indefenseofplants.com/blog/2017/12/12/the-travel...


Big herb. Not really a woody plant.

I dont think 1 and 2 are that clear cut. We recently started using Codex at work. I never thought it would be able to do even closer to what it has been doing for me in our legacy code base.

But I am not the fan of code it writes most of the times. I want my code to read and behave certain way. I can not submit that code, even if it works, if I can't explain or just don't like it. I then iterate over that code myself or ask AI until it has the shape I agree with.

For my personal side projects I don't care as much what code looks like as long as it works correctly and easily modifiable. But for work, it still remains my responsibility no matter which tool was used.


I want this thing to have flailing hands and shouting 'weeee'

By the author of the library

> This was achieved through showing Claude Code and Codex the browsers ground truth, and have them measure & iterate against those at every significant container width, running over weeks

https://x.com/_chenglou/status/2037715226838343871?s=20

There was another comment about using Autoresearch probably for this but I might be misremembering


This feels like a great example of a project that wouldn't exist if not for AI coding.

This could become/converted to a userscript making it easy to inspect and more cross compatible. It's very easy these days.

To be fair, the .xpi is just a .zip file, and the JS isn't minimized.

I vibe-converted it to a userscript[1], but it doesn't work for me in qutebrowser because it depends on profile data fetched from `https://hn-trustspark.com/alltrust.json`, which seems to be periodically updated by the author, and qutebrowser has limited userscript support. :(

It could probably be worked around by fetching the data externally, but I don't want to depend on hn-trustspark.com. It would be great if the profile updating tool could be published as well.

Anyway, hope it helps someone else :)

FWIW, after a quick review of the script, it looks safe to me. As long as you trust that the served profile data is correct, and don't mind leaking your IP to it.

Great idea and kudos to the author! We need more tools like this to help us deal with spam, and not just on HN, but everywhere.

[1]: https://gist.github.com/imiric/a5d1cd187e91eb0b725c4661250e5...


Thanks! Nice, you found the alltrust.json file ha. Yes, a bg job running on an rpi leverages HN APIs and builds the alltrust file by the minute, for all "active" accounts. Technically fetching that data is all you'd need to make your own script/plugin.

It's centralized for a few reasons though, first being that client-side API requests would be discourteous to the APIs (flood/ddos), and a whole new level of error handling would be required. Shared IPs, like those in a tech company building, would easily and quickly reach the API limits. So that's the reasoning, if you're curious.


It's a good idea, provided nothing sketchy goes on either now or in a future update ... I'm playing about with it but will likely unload it soon enough.

One issue: New accounts with Zero submissions get a full green stack for "Submission Trust" (0 submissions in 0 days).

That comes across as three flat red lines and a singl tall green stack - not sure if that's the right message.

Submissions is an odd one ... those people that submit a story seen on the tech blogs once a day get bucketed together with habitual spammers of poor quality posts.


I wonder how many hallucinated wrong facts are in there. It looked like a good resource until I learned its LLM generated. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45479268

What's the base rate nowadays for hallucinations? 10%? 15%.

It's unlikely that a large volume of text will be generated at the base rate (errors compound), so the number might be higher than we expect.


I made an only sorting algo visualizer which runs same algo on many randomly sorted arrays at the same time. The swap call which actually does the sorting also does the drawing. You could draw whole array or just one swap.

It looks very cool on large arrays.

https://xosh.org/VisualizingSorts/sorting.html

https://xosh.org/sorting-algorithms-visual-comparison/


They had funny ads about it being fast. One showed opening a tab vs peeling a potato. Another one was opening a tab vs starting a jet.

I loved gestures, built in IRC client, RSS reader, notes and the experimental website hosting from the browser. There were many cool plugins too. Did it have a torrent client too? I seem to remember as if it had everything :)


They use to send you a custom binary with your name on it in the title bar or something.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: