What still blows my mind is how email has not changed for the last 15 years. Sure, Gmail has risen to the top with awesome UX and features such as labels and priority emails. But once something comes out to revolutionize email, that would be the day
Network effects are the inhibitor. Email can't change unless everybody changes at the same time. Nobody will use a new email technology that won't communicate with their existing email partners.
The closest thing to an email revolution has been replacing email with Facebook, where users whitelist each other and use that avenue to communicate instead.
No, it says "everyone is finding a way to watch it whether it is on HBO or by pirating, so why don't you figure out how to enable everyone to watch it without infringing on copyright and make some money in the process?"
That really isn't a discussion. It is one CEO explaining their decision to make their products available online. Kessler has a different idea of how HBO is going to position themselves online. Why is Newell's opinion on his business model any more valid than Kessler's?
I never understood this thing about "easily copy-able" being a reason to strip a business of their distribution rights. Yes, the actual string of 1's and 0's is easy to copy. But physically making a 60 minute episode of Game of Thrones is not so easy. I think the work they have put into making their product has earned them the right to control the distribution of their product just as much as any other business. If you don't like the way HBO distributes Game of Thrones... you don't go pirate it... you go film it yourself (although I suspect that would not be allowed either).
I think right now, HBO makes more money from selling to the cable companies than they could selling directly to people. The cable companies are very good customers of them, and I think that HBO as a company is better off not taking the money of people that feel entitled to their content.
HBO Go puts the technical infrastructure in place to eliminate the cable companies as customers if this ever changes, so they have some chance of surviving the likely collapse of the cable industry
While funny, if you reveal something like that and it is something you're not supposed to know for privacy reasons (don't know if that was the case here or not; maybe it showed up in a log entry and their privacy policy indicates that this will happen), and the information becomes more public you can get yourself into trouble (like 37Signals did when they say that the 100,000,000th file on BaseCamp was a picture of a cat. (http://37signals.com/svn/posts/3076-i-heard-you-like-numbers...)
You are absolutely correct sir. I am (21 y/o) going to be a senior in college. I notice (among my friends/fraternity) is that not many kids post statuses too often. the main sticking point is to see new photos your friends are tagged in (imho). Facebook's height was 2-3 years ago honestly
