I just checked them up and 150 RSS feeds on free account isn't enough for my usage.
If they have been around for this long and the limit was the same over the years it is likely the reason why I passed them when switching from Google Reader.
Came to ask exactly the same thing. Want to buy one for my kids to practice but I don't have an idea which would be the best given our budget and preferences so a matrix of compatible devices would be great.
Just did research into this question...I'm someone that played piano as a child and wanted to get back into it. I wanted to get something that would integrate with apps, good action and sound without making a massive investment in case I don't stick with it. I also wanted something that was small and easy to move.
My digital piano just arrived a few hours ago.
I decided on the Roland FP-30X after trying several models in store.
Pro-tip: many of the big name digital pianos are half the price in the mainland China market than in the rest of the world. Often for an upgraded model as well.
FP-30X was 3850 CNY (~US$550) including the Roland KPD-70 three pedal unit and KSC-70 stand. Delivery (to Hong Kong) was ~400 CNY.
Another good option is the FP-18 which is a mainland market-only China model that's an upgrade overthe FP-10 in that it has more sounds and also supports three pedals. It's about ~1200 CNY cheaper than the FP-30X. Downside is slightly inferior sound and speakers compared to FP-30x
I also tried out the Yamaha portables...P-525 was excellent but about 3x the cost of the FP-30x. I didn't really like feel of the action of the cheaper Yamaha (P-225?).
So far FP-30X has been great...the bluetooth MIDI interface and bluetooth interfaces work seamlessly with my iPad. I haven't tried out Hanon Pro yet but it's been really thrilling to try out the various piano learning apps. If I had these back in the 90s, I'd probably be a much better piano player now! Better late than never!
I would highly recommend Pianote if you’re looking for an online lessons resource. They have tons of YouTube videos you can check out to see if their style works for you, then you can subscribe to the actual site when you’re ready for a more structured learning path. It did wonders for me getting back into piano after a few decades off!
If you want kids to be excited about playing the piano, get a keyboard with light keys like the Yamaha EZ-300.
Combined with a learning software that can control the light (Synthesia, or the one from Yamaha itself, maybe also the one in the original post), it creates a huge amount of fun and motivation. Also works very well for adults.
Keyboards like this do not give you proper hammer-action piano keys, but it makes you discover you /want/ to be a pianist, cheaper and with fun.
(There are also a few hammer-action lit digital pianos but they aren't as fun, and already quite expensive.)
Question from an adult because it seems like you have experience with some of these tools, I’ve been using SimplyPiano for a few months, which listens to notes you play and gives you feedback, and while it is satisfying to hear the music I can’t shake that I am not really learning just copying. For instance I can play some of the advanced songs in the app but I open a piece of sheet music and I am lost. Is there similar concern for synthesia?
Yes, the same concern exists for Synthesia. It teaches a significant amount of muscle memory.
But that is not such a bad thing:
* Muscle memory is part of the game, for any instrument (at least for the ones I know).
* Some of the muscle memory is transferable. For example, when you learn some chords on Synthesia, you can transfer many of them to other parts of the keyboard, also when you're not using the tool.
* For many people, motivation must come first. Learning a piece by muscle memory shows you that you can do it. Wanting to read sheet music naturally follows, from the fact that muscle memory is limited, and to play more stuff.
* Synthesia also teaches rhythm, which some people already have but others don't. You can learn rhythm because Synthesia shows how long each note is, and you can see it coming ahead of time.
* You should learn to read music notation in all cases. Learning the concept only takes 30 seconds: Remember where one note is and do the rest by line counting. The speed of reading will come automatically over time. Then for some songs, enable Synthesia's sheet note display and cover the falling notes from sight. It will show you whether you're reading it correctly. It'll be painfully slow at the beginning but improve over a couple days. It allows you to transfer over to just reading the sheets. Eventually that will become the more convenient way, as the need to download (e.g. from MuseScore and import into Synthesia) disappears; not that it's great effort, but eventually you can just browse easy pieces of sheet music and start playing the ones you like as you see them.
Tools like Synthesia help improve on some of the skill axes; use other methods for the remaining ones.
I am an adult who takes beginner lessons from a teacher and he says with new students he often has to undo the “learning” from (sometimes years of) those apps - and it can often be devastating to the ego, especially for kids.
Im trying to get my daughter (age 8) into piano and I see the same thing echo on Reddit while doing my research.
It's no different than picking up a ball and playing basketball on your own or tennis...or a simple coding book and making a CRUD app without all the best practices or Code Complete and your fancy frameworks.
I got the exact piano op mentioned on prime day for $150?. I have Simply Piano. My daughter will ask to play the "piano game".
Last summer I signed up my daughter for Ukulele class with a teacher. She barely touched outside what was required assignments.
Yes in the perfect world I have a real piano, with a real teacher who is great with kids who makes it so fun my daughter wants to practice everyday.
But I only have one shot to get her hooked and build momentum.
IMHO passion comes first, then technique. Passion comes from having fun.
I think it's actually difficult to find a keyboard that does not do USB midi nowadays. What's more important is what keys and keybed you want, it's about being able to comfortably play on the thing, that has not much to do with this app (as at least USB midi is quite universal now, as stated)
Using Firefox on Fedora 39. It takes 1-2 seconds to start with lots of tabs reopening. I have had issues with videos not playing from time to time but other than that, I am really liking it (coming from MacOS and Chrome).
I am as n00b as someone can be on this (although I've been doing software engineer for more than 20 years now) so please ignore any nonsense I may express.
My intention is to work on news clustering and summarization. So far just by using some "clever" prompts I have been able to generate some pretty good news summaries and I have not started clustering yet. But, I have used GPT 4 so far and my educated guess is that soon enough I will hit some quality / cost limits. So, fine tuning a Llama 2 model with (hopefully) small datasets to improve costs and quality on my specific tasks seems like a reasonable path forward.
Does that make sense? Thank you for your answer!!!
I think it depends on the task and the result of the fine tune which is mainly based on the training dataset and ability of the base model, whether you will be able to maintain the quality.
Introvert and HSP software engineer here. Not only working from home comes naturally for me but I have to say that since I started WFH 15 years ago, I've been a top performer in most of the teams I worked for (and that includes some teams where I was the only remote worker). I don't see any reason why I should work from an office at this point in my career and it actually makes little sense to me why some companies are losing top performers just to enforce some silly back to the office rules. I guess they just promoted the wrong people :)
Bought a Lenovo laptop for my daughter's school work but she was not able to use it. So, removed windows and installed Fedora 39 on it. All of the sudden a $480 USD laptop became a full blown python development workstation in no time. Everything just worked out of the box, got my Logi MX Master 3s configured and even touchpad gestures work!!! Can't be happier. I still use my MBP for work, but my personal projects now have their own Fedora powered dedicated laptop. For me, this is the year of Linux on the desktop!!!
(Security isn't my specialization, so somebody please correct me if I'm wrong).
My understanding is that two APIs talking to each other and exchanging one time tokens is better than the same APIs exchanging passwords. Passwords are susceptible to phishing attacks, rainbow tables, dumb password requirement policies, and also just basic fuckups like transmitting in clear text or not hashing and salting it.
Compared to time based software OTPs that 1Password also did, I don't see any security improvements there. But the user experience is better (one click instead of multiple).
Compared to gold standard 2fa (something you know AND something you are or have), I think passkeys are actually a downgrade. They wouldn't be if you used your hardware secure enclave as your key storage, but you can't do that if you want the convenience of cloud sync, so we're back to square one.
All in all it seems to me that passkeys primarily offer better convenience with good enough, not optimal, security. Which is probably the right balance IMO.
