Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | qubidt's commentslogin

yeah I'm sure all those children were "terrorists". what a ghoulish thing to say

My ideal software: buggy in ways you can't diagnose, for reasons you can't intuit, reproducible by literally no one in the world, and with no one to file a bug report to

I love the idea of all software everywhere involving a die roll. Sounds like it'll be even more infuriating than most computing is right now.

The BOFH is grinning in his cave.

I've found many developers having switched to non-github forges (e.g. forgejo/gitlab/sourcehut or what have you), but particularly self-hosted instances, to sort of opt-out of the culture around mpdern-day open source. My sense is the barrier of entry is a social signal that they'd like to opt out of being assigned community manager+tech support+moderator for anonymous users. typically there isn't a functional issue here, but I guess avoiding the town square is a good way to avoid having to interact with the town drunk/crank/large language model

An inane point. Obviously it's a "preference" rather than a "requirement" that my text editor boot in less than 30 seconds. But it's also not a functional requirement that Home Depot's POS terminals take a long time to start. If you could do the same checks and caching in a few hundred milliseconds it would only improve the usability for the cashier. You haven't made a case for why some user interfaces shouldn't start instantly, only that their slow start-up _might_ be justified


> If you could do the same checks and caching in a few hundred milliseconds it would only improve the usability for the cashier.

No it wouldn't. Those interfaces are permanent and only get restarted once a day or if the hardware has to be rebooted. Same for Emacs: there's absolutely no need to start the editor every single time.

> You haven't made a case for why some user interfaces shouldn't start instantly

I'm not making any case, we're not in court. Startup time is irrelevant and your fixation with it is really funny (up to a point).


> They would have been reasonable scifi books (for their time) if they hadn't attempted to follow up the classics.

I agree with everything except this. The sequels are by far the worst books I've read this decade. The memories of reading them actively causes me psychic damage. I wish I could Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind myself just to extract the distaste from my brain


Do you have a link to the youtube channel? "SWEet" isn't really searchable


The video in question:-

https://youtu.be/_mL1uaOgGvc

Although the channel is indeed called SWEet, I should have given the YouTube channel handle, SWEetOverflows.


This implies that the harm caused by this broad surveillance technology is "hypothetical/theoretical", when there is long history in this country's government using private companies to launder otherwise illegal surveillance of political activists[1].

And even if you ignore the historical parallels, there are already cases of: officers using Flock systems to stalk dating partners[2][3], immigration enforcement using Flock data to track targets[4], and ICE/CBP bypassing the systems in place that let local jurisdictions choose not to share with federal agencies[5].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Goals_Foundation

[2]: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2026/01/12/menasha...

[3]: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2026/02/24/mpd-off...

[4]: https://www.404media.co/ice-taps-into-nationwide-ai-enabled-...

[5]: https://jsis.washington.edu/humanrights/2025/10/21/leaving-t...


I'll acknowledge that there might be some abuses of the use of Flock data by authorities (thanks for sharing citations). I would argue that this is an access control problem: do police departments have broad, unrestricted, unmonitored persistent access to these video feeds? (I oppose this). Is Flock insisting that police departments should have this access?


This is relatively niche, but that's a thing for anime fan-encodes. Some groups publish their vapoursynth scripts, allow you to produce the same re-encoding (given you have the same source video). e.g.:

* https://github.com/LightArrowsEXE/Encoding-Projects

* https://github.com/Beatrice-Raws/encode-scripts


Hm, the video itself would probably be referenced by an indexable identifier like "Anime X Season 1 Chapter 5", and provisioning of the actual video would be up to the builder to get (probably from some torrent network or from DVD although no one will do that)


How does this compare to shiv? https://github.com/linkedin/shiv


Shiv doesn't pack a python interpreter, it looks like this does


You can pack a Python interpreter but by default it downloads it (if not already cached)


The assertion that it is possible or the attribution to Feynman? Scientific American [1] references Feynman's 4th Messenger lecture at Cornell: "Symmetry in Physical Law" (1964) [2] [3]

[1] https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/degrees-of-freedom/gala...

[2] https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/messenger.html

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7K1kXeK-tY


Sorry, I meant a hypothetical definition of "left".


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: