Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | prayerslayer's commentslogin

Somewhat related question: I quite enjoy such articles where people take apart consumer electronics, although I don't know the jargon ("an extruded plastic tube with a secondary rotational drilling operation" - wat?). Does someone know accessible resources (as in "no dry textbooks") for mechanical engineering?


Watch AvE take stuff apart on Youtube. His disassembly of the Juicero would be a good place to start: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Cp-BGQfpHQ or this one disassembling an overpriced Dyson hairdryer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-vJxez9UF8


IFixIt documents teardowns. They are very interesting and easy to read.


Nice idea to provide only notes from a chord! It's really motivating if you never made music before. ("Wow I can do this!")


Would you mind explaining the mechanics of this in more detail? I too was wondering why whatever I did seemed to sound good.


All the notes are from a single scale. You pick one of two available scales, the "major" and "minor", which in this case are the Pentatonic major and minor scales respectively. That it has 5 tones is obvious since you might notice that each tone is repeated 5 steps above, in the next octave up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentatonic_scale#Major_pentato...

The reason this scale is so popular for this type of music device - "penatatonic sequencers" - is because it's almost impossible to screw up. So you could describe using the pentatonic scale as removing some of the opportunity for making the music more interesting, but in return you almost completely eliminate any opportunity to make it "sound bad". Any note can follow any note in the pentatonic scale, which is why "randomize" or handing it to a child (which is the same thing) works as a creation method.


aaahhh that's why it sounded right. I'm disappointed :-)


I run the same setup. Probably don't get any traffic because I don't write blog posts anymore. My monthly costs are around $ 0.70.


> all the photos I will take will have been probably already shot by someone else

> Obviously not that realistic

Depends on how literally you want to take it. Lighthouses have definitely been photographed before. Photos depicting the man vs wild nature archetype too.


If you wonder where ASCII scribbles come from, I use http://asciiflow.com/ all the time for READMEs.


Sorry for shameless plug, but there's also my http://textik.com, which is for more structured editing, and also written in Elm.


Such a great app. Use it all the time for code comments and readmes.


I get your overall point that it's better than nothing, but you'll have to admit semver makes promises that just don't hold up in reality:

> because you know that PATCH and MINOR don't require your attention

:)

In 99 % of cases, they don't. But you're never completely sure.


> Have you used js.spec or clojure.spec in production?

Not yet, but I have some use cases (mostly validation).


Cool, thanks for sharing. I didn't know that one.


MUMEN RIDER!


This handbook assumes that JS execution really is your bottleneck and not network, DOM, what not. I doubt this is the case in the majority of applications, so following these tips might be even counterproductive as they sometimes come at the cost of readability.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: