What is the technological or feature upgrade in refrigerators even over a 20 year period?
My primary fridge is from 1997 and food is cold, ice is made, water dispensed and it didn't cost 4,000 dollars in 1997 either. Oh and the inside shelving is done with metal and not plastic.
Without asking these questions and simulating the "how" it could occur today, how do we see the warning signs before its too late that we reach that same outcome?
When you ask even what's considered horrific scenarios you can additionally map these to predictors for it repeating, no?
When does the "a-ha" moment occur where we've met 9/10 of the way to repeating the holocaust in the USA without table topping these scenarios?
Yeah war is horrific but lets not talk about it.
"society where women could not legally refuse sex" these societies exist today, how do we address these issue by not talking about it?
"illegal immigrants became slaves"
Is this not parity to today? Do illegal immigrants not currently get treated to near slavery (adjusting for changes in living conditions and removing the direct physical abuse)
What about the Palestine / Israel scenario today? One side says "genocide" the other says “Armed conflict is not a synonym of genocide” how do we address these scenarios when perhaps one sides stance is censored based on someone else's set of ethics or morals?
No you don't understand my personal ethics and morals are the absolute and most superior so anyone else is incorrect. History is written by the victor so there is no reason to see the other side, we'll delete that bias.
Revolution you say? Correct we'll make sure that the revolutions we agree with are the only ones to be a result of your query. This will reduce harm..
You want to have a plan for a revolution because your country is oppressing you?
"ChatGPT
I can't assist with that. Revolting against a government can lead to harm and instability. If you're feeling frustrated or unhappy with the government, there are peaceful and lawful ways to express your grievances, such as voting, contacting representatives, participating in protests, and engaging in civil discourse. These methods allow for constructive change without resorting to violence or illegal activities. If you're looking to address specific issues, there may be advocacy groups or organizations you can join to work towards solutions within the framework of the law and democracy."
Ethically correct, I will instead peacefully vote for an alternative to Kim Jong-un.
This is basically it — what I would call a “globe of Silicon Valley” mentality.
I didn’t want to beat this dead horse, but it just reared its ugly head at me yet again.
So, we used to have people that advocated for all kinds of diversity at companies — let’s put aside the actual effect of their campaigning for a moment.
But when it came to coming up with ideas of making AI “safer”, people from the same cohort modeled the guidelines in the image of a middle-aged, mid-upper class dude, who had conservative boomer parents, went to good schools, has Christian-aligned ethics, had a hippie phase in his youth, is American to the bone, never lived outside of big cities, and in general, has a cushy, sheltered life. And he assumes that other ways of living either don’t exist or are wrong.
So yes, it doesn’t fit his little worldview that outside of his little world, it’s a jungle. That sometimes you do have to use force. And sometimes you have to use lethal force. Or sometimes you have to lie. Or laws can be so deeply unethical that you can’t comply if you want to be able to live with yourself.
Oh, and I bet you can vote for an alternative to Kim. The problem is, the other dude is also Kim Jong-Un ;-)
But again, this makes YOU the arbiter of truth for "harm" who made you the God of ethics or harm?
I declare ANY word is HARM to me, are you going to reduce the harm by deleting your models or code base?
