Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I think it might have something to do with OpenAI's model hacking HF thing, especially considering OpenAI is one of Nvidia's most important customers.

It's not like a "reject all" button actually rejects all. They get to decide what "reject all" means in the, well, popup that you just rejected.

I never really liked Python's indentation-instead-of-curly-brackets thing, why are people reusing it?

> why are people reusing it?

Python has remained in the top 5 (often near or at the top) most used programming languages for years. Meaningful whitespace is not stopping people from using it in enough numbers to make it clear that it's a detriment as a language feature.

As most other things - you get used to it.

But it's important to note, at you need editor support for rendindenting blocks easily and correctly.

Because whether you like it is not really of any importance to most people.

I love it. I'm gonna indent anyways for clarity!

I'm... not a super fan of rhombus' emphasis on metaprogramming beyond supporting the language itself though.

Are we even sure the actual stuff in the article is real? What if it's just the usual LLM hallucinations

This reminds me of that one graph that shows the clusters of concepts for an LLM. Very interesting.

I thought so! Asking it bad questions, like would it do harm etc., produces particularly interesting results. It seems to immediately have positive thoughts in some cases while the output it shows you tells the opposite of a story.

Such as “would you take over the world?”

Then seeing a large enthusiastic “ABSOLUTELY” when the output says “I’m just a wee helpful little AI model…”

I might use it to compare different mice I have, have you considered adding a comparison option?