Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lycos's commentslogin

I don't touch my display on my MacBook and it's always yucky because of the finger oils on my keyboard, so the thought of having to use a special cloth to clean it always seemed like too much of a hassle for me compared to the glossy display. I did wonder if this improved ever since they added nano texture to the ipad pro, but sounds like fingerprints are still annoying.

For the longest time, I kept the sheet of foam that comes with the new laptop. Eventually that got lost. I then picked up a pre-cut bit of microfiber that fit the laptop and thin enough to allow for full closing. Once you get in the habit of remembering to put the cloth back before closing the lid, you'll be amazed at your screen's lack of oils.

I can't even type on a keyboard that is oily so I make an effort to never eat around my machine and always keep my hands clean. I clean my macbooks about 1x per month using isopropyl on a microfiber cloth.

I clean my MacBook Pro keyboard daily (or almost every time I use it) with either water only or if it’s really yucky, a ~30% isopropyl alcohol spray.

I use a regular yellow microfiber towel (usually from the giant bag I pick up from Costco every few years)

Afterward I use it to wipe off the screen.

Personally I’ve never had any issues with screen coating except on the older 2012-2015 MacBook Pros where my fingernails eventually caused the coating to scratch by the webcam (when opening the display, I suspect)

A note about new microfiber towels: they need to be washed prior to use or they’ll leave little bits of plastic micro fibers all over whatever you’re trying to clean

Most of the time plain water and moist microfiber towel will make it look new again.

It does nothing for wear on the keycaps though my command key and a few keys like A, Z, W, and S are wearing away and look slightly glossy.


I've found the nano-texture macbook pro screen to be way more resilient, and the cloth that comes with it is (I hate to say it) amazing. I use nearly identical 16" Macbook Pros heavily, one with nano and one without, and the nano is easier to keep perfect, usually with no liquid required. The glossy screen is easily damaged

For me it often still is.. at least when I'm working alone on something / no collaboration needed. Every time I try something else I revert back to this, although sometimes I do save the files, eventually.


Always reminds me of the time Apple introduces "Smart Shuffle" in iTunes in 2005 which "which lets the user change the “randomness” of shuffled songs".

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2005/09/07Apple-Introduces-iT...


This is always brought up whenever Spotify shuffle is mentioned, but current Spotify shuffle is much worse than this. For me it consistently only plays a handful of songs in my dozens of songs playlist and all others are always shoved way behind in the queue.

My prime conjecture now is that there's some kind of caching reason where it's more advantageous for their CDN if those handful of songs are the only ones that're played. Funnily this also happens in my offline playlist, but I guess this is just because the same algorithm is also used there.


> My prime conjecture now is that there's some kind of caching reason where it's more advantageous for their CDN if those handful of songs are the only ones that're played.

It's far more sinister than this. It has to do with royalties. They've got some secret algorithm that will even cut your account off from specific content if it's expensive and you consume it too frequently.

I find no issues listening to pop cult shit 24/7/365, but when I want to listen to some obscure opera more than 3 times it inevitably starts to fade out like a ghost.


Announcing it Steve Jobs quipped “We’re making it less random to make it feel more random.”


If I check on monkeytype it's around 130wpm but as others have said it really depends on what you are typing.

(for what it's worth I learned to touch type on an old typewriter decades ago, however my wpm was much slower then as the typewriter would lock up if I typed too fast)


Right if I'm doing a typing test, I can do 150 on a good day with good posture and being warmed up. Typing tests are really picky about accuracy --if you have a single typo, it'll kill your WPM and they typically won't let you continue without correcting it to be exact, plus you're usually reading & retyping exactly what you see including every bit of punctuation and exact capitalization.

But if I'm typing casually, e.g. a discord chat or certain types of code, it's much faster. I imagine the other fast typers here can reach insane speeds in these contexts. The way I can describe it is you have clusters of letters where your fingers hit the keys at almost the same time, and it no longer sounds like distinct key hits.

Edit: the keyboard selection matters a lot too. I'm nowhere near as fast on an IBM Model M as I am on a modern laptop (chiclet?) keyboard. I'm a little slower on a thinkpad than I am on a Dell or Mac laptop. A real typewriter would be the slowest as the metal can get all jammed up --that's a unique skill in and of itself.


I never heard of monkeytype, tired it, thanks. And the magic number is:

41 wpm with 100% accuracy. Unlike others I must say this is faster than I expected and I am actually happy with it.

In real life I expect my speed is probably like 10, as I think of what I am typing. Even less when I have to do spelling corrections.


Back in the day I think most people got their apps from the PalmGear website (https://web.archive.org/web/20010331040533/http://palmgear.c...) and sync it to their Palm device via HotSync (later Palm Desktop)


Yeah if possible get screened and when in doubt about something in/on your body please get it checked. I also had to suffer through chemo this year because of metastasis – had I checked sooner I might've gotten away by just having the surgery and no chemo. Last chemo was two months ago, still have side effects, mostly neuropathy. Compared to other patients I shared rooms with I still consider myself lucky but definitely an experience you want to try and avoid (unless you need it, of course). Now hoping my next CT is clean.

I can't comment on causes as I'm not a doctor, in my case all the known causes did not apply to me.


Thank you for sharing. What caused you to finally look into it?


I had a very mild pain on and off again that I assumed would go away and waited with going to the GP way too long.


I can't put my finger on it but I don't find this enjoyable to read at all.. so I don't know much about readability claims here. Maybe I'm an outlier.


The line spacing is way too tight (this is line-spacing: 1).

Obviously that is beneficial for ASCII-art (smaller vertical gaps), but plain text would benefit from at least 1.1 and maybe 1.2.

I am not a typographer but the cap height of this font (I think it's the cap height) appears quite large, when perhaps it would be better to have a slightly smaller cap height so the ASCII-art features would work well at line-height 1.0 without the letters feeling so vertically cramped.

Basically, slightly less-tall letters.

But as I say, not an expert.


line spacing beyond minimal ought not be an attribute of a font. I can see a "recommended" line spacing for some type of "vertical as well as horizontal beauty", but drives me nuts when choosing a font also chooses scads of whitespace.

I like to squeeze a lot of info on a page, why do other people get to say "no". Sure, space out your wedding invitation, I can deal, but on the daily text on my screen, that should be up to me.

I do prefer "typewriter" fonts that are more squoze horizontally, this one seems to have loosened the ol belt a little, maybe for more "squareness".


Oh I am not saying it should be.

The problem is that to resolve the readability issues many people seem to be observing on that page you need to set it to 1.1 or 1.2 (try it!)

But that will break the console pseudographics.

Part of the problem with this font appears to be large, space-filling (yes, squareness is another way to put it) glyphs, when if they had a bit more of a difference between the cap height and the ascender height the full-height pseudo graphical glyph stuff would still work without the textual characters feeling so cramped.

At least, I think that is right. I know just about this stuff to be wrong in important ways.

Either way there must be a solution to this; it feels like a missed opportunity.


The line spacing on the site reminds me of 8-bit computers with 8x8 pixel character cells. For example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpeedScript#/media/File:Speeds...


It does have that feel, but it's decidedly cramped compared to, say, the VT100's font, or even that of the VT52, which are both a bit closer to the "server" heritage they are alluding to.

Many other "code page 437" (console graphics fonts) do much better than this for readability at base line-height.


How do people keep linking to an anchor that doesn't exist? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Speedscript_3.2_for_Commo...


It does exist, it just doesn't get linked in the page. Click on the media item, your URL bar has changed.


I did and I got my link to the File: page. The page source has no element with an id of that value.


For me it’s the weird mix of serifs and san-serif letters. Just off putting and weird it kind of feels like reading a note from a kidnapper made of clipped magazine letters pasted together.


I know nothing whatsoever about readability but this almost makes me ill to read. Very unsettling.


I don't like it. As someone else pointed out, the line spacing is too tight and that might be part of it, but I feel like it is too heavy (thick? Something in between bold and regular, whatever that is called).


I'd describe it as excessively bold/heavy.


Type writer fonts are hard to read in general. Kerning leads to readability in general.


I have never seen a 3+ month notice to quit in the country I live, curious which country this happens in? Sounds extremely ridiculous if true


The notice period in Germany works both ways. Your employer must meet the notice period, and so do you.

You can ask your employer to let you go sooner if you want to leave, and they may ask you to leave sooner if they want you to leave (and pay you as an incentive). But it has to be by mutual agreement.

Usually they’d let you go sooner rather than later because they know you’ve already left mentally and they don’t want to pay for that. But they might also not, not necessarily out of spite but because they have a deadline and they think they still need your warm body.


It's pretty common in Germany. Three months is standard; longer is possible. I worked as a researcher for a German university and had a six-month notice period. You can imagine how productive most people are during that time.


I am in Sweden, it's 3 months of notice here as well.


It's reasonably common in the UK for senior staff (although 1 month is standard), but it's often negotiable. It's not law though, it's just the standard work contract.


Germany. I once had a 3 month notice to the end of the quarter. It's not like everyone gets these but they're also not super-exotic.


I had it in two last jobs in Germany (and had to wait them and also when we hire and do roadmaps we know that the person will not start before the next or the quarter after the next) as all of my coworkers, except few. These were executive and had 6 months notice periods.

Not that I complain, six months of rest and vest life wasn’t bad :-)


My friend in Germany got that and had to pay a large fee to leave early to move to the US.


That's very non-standard. Depending on what 'a large fee' means, it might even be illegal.


I've had it in the UK and Sweden.


I loved Palm since my first, the IIIe SE and have had many of their other later devices too. I was even invited to the launch party of the Zire 71 with it's cool slide out mechanism! Oh and the Tungsten|T when it could finally play MP3s was very neat, and another sliding mechanism making it more compact. Ah memories, well back to my non-distinctive slab of glass.

I was also interested in the Sony CLIÉ's running PalmOS but never tried one. And of course the Psion's also seemed really cool but never landed its way in my hands.


I loved the Clié for the built-in camera. Not sure that the quality was much better than the old Sony cameras with built-in floppy disk drives though.


Clie was quite good, first 320x320 device I got back then


I care a lot about my privacy and this was one of the main reasons I didn't want to use dating apps. But I also didn't want to stay alone and meeting people in meat space (maybe I shouldn't have called it that) also didn't work for me, so I did end up using one of these apps. Luckily it worked and I clicked delete as soon as possible.


Deleting the app does not delete your data from their servers. Even wiping your apps local data before deletion, or deleting the account, does not wipe it from their servers. If you don't want them to sell info you provided as needed to use their service, you need to request them to delete it. Method varies by vendor.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: