It is commonly referred to as a ‘short position’, though it is not ‘shorting the stock’. Equally, purchasing calls* is referred to as a ‘long position’ (as is holding the equity).
edit: smallmancontrov below pointed out that I wrote 'purchasing puts' was long, when I meant to write 'purchasing calls'
It’s all a matter of perspective I suppose, and of course I understand why you say this, but no professional options trader I’ve ever met would speak in these terms.
that's a terrible and arguably broken-by-design workflow which entirely defeats the point of the monorepo, which is to have a unified build of everything together, rather than building things piecemeal in ways that could be incompatible.
For C++ in particular, you need to express your dependencies in terms of source versions, and ensure all of the build artifacts you link together were built against the same source version of every transitive dependency and with the same flags. Failure to do that results in undefined behaviour, and indeed I have seen large organizations with unreliable builds as a manner of routine because of that.
The best way to achieve that is to just build the whole thing from source, with a content-addressable-store shared with the whole organization to transparently avoid building redundant things. Whether your source is in a single repo or spread over several doesn't matter so long as your tooling manages that for you and knows where to get things, but ultimately the right way to do modular is simply to synthesize the equivalent monorepo and build that.
Sometimes there is the requirement that specific sources should have restricted access, which is often a reason why people avoid building from source, but that's easy to work around by building on remote agents.
Now for some reason there is no good open-source build system for C++, while Rust mostly got it right on the first try.
Maybe it's because there are some C++ users still attached to the notion of manually managing ABI.
I wouldn’t call it very easy. You drive to a place and have some beers. Then you have the choice of leaving your car or drive above the BAC. Most people choose the latter.
It's quite easy to decide not to drive to a place if you are going to have a few beers over too short of a time to safely and legally drive home, or to choose not to have too many beers if you need to drive to and from the place.
If a market maker sells a put and wants to stay delta neutral, they would need to sell shares -- not buy. Selling a put is a long position, not a short.
Also the announcement wasn't a surprise. To whatever degree this announcement might have an effect on future corporate earnings (a fairly dubious connection imho) it was already priced in.
That's the thing though... with chronic pain there is no end to the physical pain, and this fact alone can be mentally taxing. Sometimes taking your mind off your situation is more effective than painkillers. Chronic pain is a life long mental _and_ physical battle.
In the example given here, how would one answer the following questions:
1. For a given school, return all the students
2. For a given school, return all the classes
In the last data model given (the correct one), the above 2 things can't be done (I think) without doing something funky like enumerating all the Enrollments and finding unique students/classes. In order to modify the data model to provide the needed information, wouldn't you run into the same borrow checker problems?
