Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lotsofpulp's commentslogin

Maybe they used an LLM powered bot to make the favorable comment here in order to guarantee the results.

And LLM powered bot also downloads our app and produces reviews?

It's an app on playstore which anyone can see including reviews.


Why would streaming be the best option for you to watch a movie once? You have long been able to rent movies with just a few clicks from many sellers. Maybe Netflix is the only one where you have to subscribe for a month to watch a movie.

I picked a random film, Titanic, and supposedly it's $4 to rent on Amazon or Apple TV.

A Netflix account costs $9 with ads or $20 without, so I guess it depends on whether you watch more or fewer films than that per month?


JFC, it didn't even cost $4 to rent titanic when it was new.

The average household cable tv subscription didn't get you access to all the music, enormous amount of youtube content, shipping benefits, and ad-break free watching. And it wasn't on demand viewing. And it required using a special device in a specific room in a specific house.

And, back in the day, you also had contract terms of 1 or 2 years, so you were locked in. Now, you can turn these services on and off at your whim

Exactly, what we have now is vastly better than whatever existed before (in terms of convenience and price). Watch when I want, what I want, how I want, and never pay for anything I don't want and never see ads and never have to go somewhere to get it.

I especially like not paying for sports to watch the few shows/movies I like.

Some people who like to (legally) own media might be disappointed, though.


As someone who loves buying music - yeah, I hear that.

I just never really felt like the incentives were quite the same to purchase movies. They've always been constrained by their formats/vendors in a way that was never as true for music, they've always cost more, I don't rewatch movies as much as I'll re-listen to albums, and I think the...I dunno...nature, telos of movies lends itself better to ephemeral access.


>It's not enough to have data, you also have to have societal buy-in.

The lower auto liability and umbrella insurance premiums alone would drive buy-in.

It’s literally the riskiest thing people do with the costliest consequences.


I wonder if that stat is true if removing the kids in gangs from the data. One cause of death is relatively undiscerning and applicable to all, but the other cause of death might only apply to a few. But I don’t know, I’d like to see the actual stat.

It was regulated away in the Durbin Amendment of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law:

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R41913

https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/new-rules-el...

American sellers have had the option to collect however much extra they want from people paying with credit cards, and many do. The government, utilities, mobile network providers, insurance, schools, healthcare, gas stations, home contractors, etc all usually collect at least 2% to 3% more if a buyer wants to pay with a credit card.

I am down to only using my credit cards for retail purchases, restaurants, and travel. Otherwise, the extra cost of paying with credit cards don't make sense and I pay with debit card or electronic money transfer (ACH/Zelle).

Basically, the sellers that continue to collect the same price from credit card users and non credit card users are those who believe that incentivizing credit card usage will result in sufficient people paying sufficiently higher prices such that it offsets the processing costs of the credit card transaction (and the chargeback risk).


It is interesting the breadth of experiences in this regard. I pay basically everything on my card, to the tune of 5-6 grand a month, including utilities. The only time I have ever seen a surcharge is for things like contractors doing work at my house. The gas company, electric, the city, all take the card with no extra charge. I rack up a lot of airline miles just from day-to-day use.

None of the utilities for my house take credit card without surcharge.

What does cost driven system and driver even mean? The cost of something is the ratio of demand to supply.

If something is not costing a lot, then it means there is sufficient supply that obtaining it is not going to require sacrifices elsewhere.

If something does cost a lot, then it means there isn't sufficient supply, and obtaining it is going to require sacrifices elsewhere.

Healthcare is obviously one of those things, especially with a top heavy population age histogram, where supply is not going to be sufficient so costs will remain high. And if costs are high, then obviously they will decide how resources get allocated, that is the very nature of something that is high cost.


At this point, do people prefer to accept a claim in a lawsuit as the truth if it happens to conform to their model of reality?

Yes, it's pretty clear that's a common pattern.

Why reflexively side with Amazon on this? They've been known to engage in such anti-workers practice, and have spent millions on union-busting and other illegal stuff like this.

My comment does not indicate I sided with anyone, nor should anyone else solely based on the information the a claim in a lawsuit exists.

So much of social media (low voted submissions here too) boils down to people fighting over ideological symbols or trying to hear a series of appropriate echoes. If you support the suit you probably "hate Amazon" and if you don't "You're a bootlicker".

The idea that you could not support Amazon or their practices, but also not take this lawsuit as some grand symbol of everything wrong with Amazon and the world is nuance most find repellent online, and increasingly offline.


When it comes to a company known to hire union-busters rather than deal with a burgeoning union in good faith? Yes. Yes they do.

[flagged]


If you take the time to really think through the implications of that viewpoint, you might be horrified by the outputs you get.

I have an iphone 13mini at 5 years and 81% capacity.

My 13pro is at 84% capacity, but in the last month or two it seems to lose charge much more rapidly than it used to. Probably the only reason I'll consider an upgrade.

Very jealous over here. I had a 12 mini whose battery dropped off a cliff just in time for the mini line to get discontinued.

Big phones are overrated.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: