Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kristaps's commentslogin

The article specifically mentions US banks and as I personally didn't see any disruption over here - is there (anec)data on how popular CrowdStrike is in the US vs the EU?


Can't have disruption from CrowdStrike if you run on IBM mainframes with cobol coz your math only opens gates for new technologies once in 25 years.


Oh wow an Anathem reference!

To answer the question, CrowdStrike is a global company with thousands of employees around the world. Not sure why the EU wasn't hit as hard.


Might be question what type of disruption it is. Transfers and web bank is likely to work. Branches offices and ATMs might have issues. So if you try to do anything in person or negotiate anything with workers in bank there could be issues.


Try todays puzzle and let us know how part 2 goes!


Yeah, that touch of ambiguity looked very deliberate, to give LLMs a hard time.


Last year there were people solving the puzzles with LLMs, but I don't think I saw anyone get past day 5 or so.

I'm interested in how well it goes this year.

Please reply if you are trying yourself or can link to public attempts by others


Out of curiosity after finishing my solution, I tried it with chatgpt 4.0 Part1 worked after me explaining a tiny bug. Part2 however never worked. Even after explaining exactly where the bug was in the python solution got came up with, it couldn’t fix it. It was quite fascinating watching it try over and over with different approaches, but it couldn’t even get the example working.

This just goes to show how good of a puzzle maker Eric is if it stumped gpt4 on day1 when last year gpt3.5 did the first 5 days.


Last year, I used ChatGPT on one of the first puzzles, and ended up writing a blog post about it, where I sort of do commentary on the conversation.

It's funny to read this a year later, and filter it through my experiences with ChatGPT over the last year. Some of it still rings true, some of it would probably be much improved with GPT-4. But the places where the LLM fell down in my examples are still the same kinds of issues you get using GPT as an assistant today.

If you're interested: https://epiccoleman.com/posts/2022-12-03-chatgpt-aoc


Part two of today's problem makes me wonder if they're trying to come up with puzzles that aren't easy for LLMs to complete but might end up making things that also discourage humans from playing.


The quickest time of the first star is suspicious...


Can you elaborate? I think I recognise your username :-)


This year they politely ask people not to use LLM solutions until the days leaderboard is full.


But is there any way to know the difference?


Not really when all they check is the solution output. They just ask politely knowing cheaters gonna cheat.


77% of top 10M sites - sounds like reeling in the long tail for effect, has to be way lower for the top 1K sites.


Probably an 80s sysadmins dream, but are multi-user Unix machines really that much of a thing currently?


Yes in the research computing world (HPC and similar systems, and some other sorts of shared resource) at least. On Linux-based machines you can limit resources otherwise, via PAM, or startup of interactive sessions in a distributed resource manager ("batch system").


I've been using UNIX-like machines (mostly Linux) since the mid-2000s and single-user machines have always been the exception rather than the norm everywhere I've been.

Even at home, I've set up multiple accounts for myself (main one, one for closed-source programs, one for gaming I can share with other people…) and for my family (to each their preferences, wallpaper and so on). Having two or three user sessions running at the same time is not uncommon. I'm probably the exception here, but I don't think Podman targets the regular home user anyway.

It's not obvious to me how Podmansh would revolutionize that, but I guess it's nice, I'll try it for sure.


For all the things wrong with node, I envy the relative filename importing they have when writing Python.


when I moved from Python to NodeJS years ago the way that `require( './path/to/file.js' );` works was a total revelation. There are still arguments being mafe about NodeJS's `require` rules being too complicated (e.g. using optionally implicit extensions) but even with that, NodeJS's `require()` method is hands down superior to Python's `import` statement.


Eh, could fit into a busier "Acrid avid jam shred", I think


> As a four-stroke engine only fires twice for every rotation of the crankshaft

Should be the other way around, each cyinder fires once every two revolutions.


Yup, I spotted that two.

He correctly divided by 2, though.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: