That really tripped me too and made it hard to focus on the rest is the article. I had this feeling all the way through that he's hiding things, which doesn't make much sense given the kind of content.
There was something unsatisfactory to V1 users in the V2 system. Depth was jittery or whatever it had been.
V1 was based on an Israeli structured light tech that later became Apple TrueDepth, a static dot pattern taken with a camera which deviations becomes depth. V2 was technically an early and alternative implementation of Time-of-Flight LIDAR based on a light phase delaying device, that output deviations from set known distance as pictures or something along that.
There wouldn't have been lacking app support issues if V2 did work. There was/were something that made users be "yeah... by the way" about it.
The problem with the v2, from someone who had a boss that loved the kinect and used it in retail environments experimentally wasn't the new tech. The new tech was/is amazing. The level of detail you can get from the v2 dwarfs the v1 on every axis.
The problem was that it ONLY had a windows SDK and most of the people who did amazing work outside of games and the xbox with the kinect v1 were using it with macs and linux in tools like openframeworks and processing. The v1 was developed outside microsoft and primesense and there were SDKs that were compatible cross platform. Tons of artists dove right in.
The KinectV2 only offered a windows sdk, and that's what killed it in the 'secondary market'.
These things are "cost optimized" and don't feature the kind of remote management iDRAC/openBMC/piKVM that would allow it to be remotely fixed. Embedded windows connected to the internet is super ***.
> There was always going to be an opinion war after 1200 massacred civilians, when a large portion of the other side doesn't take the primary tack of "stop bombing Palestine" but instead "Free Palestine".
The West Bank shows what happens if they only stop being bombed without actually being free. Palestine needs to be free in order for there to be peace.
Your comment implies that Palestinian civilians can't have peace until Israeli territory is ceded back to them. This is in the context of October 7th and a the current Gaza seige. It is reflective of the loudest echo in the war zone.
There won't be a single outcome but the most negative one for radicalized Palestinian civilians as a result. Hopefully, morally clearer voices will be raised higher.
No I think his comment implies Gazans see how Israeli settlers treat West Bank Palestinians (sometimes burning their homes while families are inside and laughing at whosoever dies) and think that they'd rather support strongmen who attempt to fight back against Israel.
It's the exact same mentality that drove normal Afghan people to support the Taliban.