Claude can already do this: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/github-action...

Yes, I love github actions for claude code! And use it myself for code reviews.

The original title is "Objects should shut the fuck up". I don't like unnecessary cursing either, but it is emphasizing his frustration in this case and cursing objects, not people.

Renaming the title is just losing information for no reason.

Not sure I would consider a user copy-pasting an URL being a bot.

Should curl be considered a bot too? What's the difference?

> Should curl be considered a bot too? What's the difference?

Perplexity definitely does:

    $ curl -sI https://www.perplexity.ai | head -1
    HTTP/2 403

It gets blocked in my setup because bots use this as a workaround.

This implementation is unnecessary complicated. For the step update, you can use Out Of Band update: https://htmx.org/attributes/hx-swap-oob/ which works in a way that you can send multiple HTML fragments which can be anywhere on the page and HTML swaps them out. Good for notifications, step update, breadcrumb update, menu highlight, etc...

I usually solve the second problem by simply saving the state of the individual input fields, you only need a user session. Depending your use-case, you might need to be transactional, but you can still do this saving everything as "partial" and close the "transaction" (whatever it might mean in the given context) at the last step. Much-much simpler than sending form data over and over.

> For the step update, you can use Out Of Band update

I did mention using OOB, but I preferred swapping the entire Stepper because the logic on the backend was just a little bit cleaner, and the Stepper didn't include anything else anyways.

> I usually solve the second problem by simply saving the state of the individual input fields, you only need a user session.

I believe this is exactly what I did in the article, no?

This sucks out the joy of Open Source development, which is freedom to do anything, change anything and not responsible for anyone else.

At the point you require payments, users can have expectations and requests, which turns your project into a job.

In this case the joy was already sucked out a while ago by entitled users.

It sounds like you maintain a successful Open Source project. :)

I have a rule for Claude Code to disallow deleting anyhting:

    "deny": [ "Bash(rm:*)" ]

I don't understand why people only think in extremes.

You don't have to give up anything you did before at all.

LLMs just here to increase your productivity, but cranking out unreviewed code where you don't want to do that is just silly to me.

It is composable with all decades old Linux CLI tools, which you simply can't do with an IDE.

It also doesn't prevent you from using an IDE at all, but still fits for people with text editors like Vim who doesn't want to use IDEs.