Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kaneraz's commentslogin

I found the link at the bottom to download Adobe as the cherry on top. Let's make sure you have a few other problems along with IE6.


It's nice that they made sure the data set contained the key data to their collapse. The pensions of retirees. Would the results have been the same if it weren't included? I don't have access to the paper but I'd be curious what their justification for their choice was.

Among other things, they looked at the total level of debt, the cash reserves of the government and the pensions of retired civil servants.


I'm a bit confused. People expected x86 emulation on ARM architectures? That sounds a bit backwards to me.


I honestly expected that they were going to try at least for the initial release. Apple did release Rosetta when they moved to Intel, which allowed PowerPC-based applications to run on x86 Macs.

I'm not sure how much use that got, though, considering that Rosetta had a lot of limitations, and fairly terrible performance in a lot of areas. That's probably the main reason that MS didn't bother trying to support it.


Rosetta worked because the switch to intel processors gave Apple such a performance boost compared to their PPC systems, that existing PPC applications worked with about the same performance as they used to on PPC native.

The same probably wouldn't be true for i386 -> ARM.


Rosetta saw plenty of use just from Adobe apps. It took them about a year and half IIRC to release an x86 version of Photoshop.


edit: and didn't Office:Mac take forever too?


yeah, office 2008 was the first native x86 version, IIR (and I swear it takes longer to start up then the PPC version of 2004 did under Rosetta, which is just ridiculous).


Yes, this article is way off target. Who exactly expected ARM Windows to run x86 applications? Show me one reference. Anyone?


When Intel trumpeted the fact that ARM Windows 8 machines wouldn't run legacy apps, MS reps called it "inaccurate and misleading". From the article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/19/microsoft_contradict....


Well, since a lot of Windows software runs on .net framework's CLR (VM with a bytecode interpreter not unlike the Java VM), a lot of legacy apps actually should run just fine on ARM.


We play with this but only on building victory points. Victory chits, largest army and longest road don't count towards the number of victory points. I don't know where this started but it has made for alot better games.


I'm going to have to go back and listen to a number of these lectures. The first video I click on the professor says "Computer Science isn't computer programming." so so true.

http://academicearth.org/lectures/life-after-programming-met...


I've always been of the opinion that diversity in your education will help you somewhere down the road. That being said you should still have one thing you focus on. If you're going to be learning how to program as a biologist, you still need to be a biologist first and a developer second.

I'm a developer first and whatever it is I'm programming for second. I learn how to do the job of the people I write code for so it will do what they need.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: