At first I thought it's the same thing but found it interesting that maybe a new morality (or a new branch) is forming now. Certainly interesting thought! Have to reread On the Genealogy of Morality...

>while themselves they thoroughly seem to think they are victimized

Interesting take, now when I think about it you are probably right. Actually this maybe shows that the "victim" morality is a thing...

Aren't all the discussions about politics, economics and society like that?

It depends on your goals I guess. I can very happily make a political discussion promoting my beliefs but keep respecting factual evidence and prevent myself from making a claim that isn't supported well enough by data/research even though it might be beneficial for my political argument.

Data/research is a very narrow lenses to look through (but important nevertheless). This master/slave morality is a very famous discussion started by philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and it's not something very scientific. Doesn't mean it's wrong.

It's not all about data and research I agree. My point is that something concrete must back up my points. Even if that is a strong reasoning system when data/research are absent. Nevertheless, cherry picking stuff to make an artificiall point is not how i roll

Apple products are easier to use until it is not. How can they not fix the keyboard for 3 years now? Linux actually also just works, it's just adviceable to do very short research before you buy hardware for it.

Apple is really going downhill...