It's fiction. I did not use AI to write it. On whether it's worthy of people's time... well, I'm not presumptuous enough to say. :)

I enjoyed reading it. Whether one believes the future will look like this fictional/hypothetical one, it encourages the reader to think about what would need to become true for this future to be plausible.

Who knows? 5 people? 10? Only those who actually read it, and still not sure. Did they read it? Or did they also believe it's written by AI? I tried to believe it's written by a human when noticed its footer's note. It was hard to believe knowing my fear of today's trends, where many read is an empty dark where human time is voided. Yet, what is the main idea behind it then, nowadays, when just a few will actually read it?

Considering, how some modern attitude works for certain people, and how much power of trends and socials may offer, such terms get boosted over... and you just hope and keep believing in people...

Related: https://medium.com/@nathanladuke/b56da64a09ee (To Those Who Comment Their Opinion Without Reading the Whole Story... I was shocked at how many people simply read the title and then posted their opinion on the whole article...)

Yes, I understand what you're saying perfectly. And I had similar thoughts while I was writing this. I do not want to talk too much about the process of writing it, or the content itself, because I feel it's not right for me (the author) to talk about it. But I'd like to make it clear that I wrote this myself, and that many of the questions and points people have raised here have also been in my mind, and it was my intention to elicit this type of thinking. Thank you and all others for the comments - I really appreciate it, even the very negative ones. This is the first time I published something online and I'm very happy that it resonated with people.

Ape writing? (kidding)

Is this available as open source anywhere to try?

A pragmatic definition that helps distinguish between resultant, weak, and strong emergent properties in interactive systems, LLMs, and incidents.

Interesting stats.

The accompanying article explains how it works: https://blog.alexewerlof.com/p/local-browser-ai

And the source code is available at: https://github.com/alexewerlof/local-browser-ai

I like how the landing page (and even this HN page until this point) completely miss any reference to Meta and Facebook. The landing page promises privacy but anyone who knows how FB used VPN software to spy on people, knows that as long as the current leadership is in place, we shouldn't assume they've all of a sudden became fans of our privacy.

Ollama isn’t connected to Meta besides offering Llama as one of the potential models you can run.

There is obviously some connection to Llama (the original models giving rise to llama.cpp which Ollama was built on) but the companies have no affiliation.

Could you be more specific about which book and chapter talked about this problem and how the solution was different or similar?

Of the top of my head I can think of Extreme Programming Explained, The Art of Agile Development, Software Teaming, The Pragmatic Programmer.

What's the ublock block thing?

IP is IP. LLM vendors are in legal battles with all sorts of IP owners. Putting it explicitly there (as awkward as it is) creates a legal obligation where the company or individual that fed it to "AI" cannot deny: "oh! I didn't know, therefore it's not stealing"