Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ha4fsd3fas's commentslogin

Well it's like any other business that runs on electricity. AWS converts electricity directly into profit. They provide a service for paying customers, just like a miner does. I'm sure many datacenters are located in places where electricity is cheap, hell I bet some datacenters get it even cheaper with lobbying.


Can you list an example of AWS building a datacenter, in secret, in a location with subsidized power? I GUARANTEE YOU Amazon lets the local municipality know when they're building a new datacenter and they aren't getting subsidized rates.


Gaming is also consuming more energy than the daily lives of a whole country __Combined__. Entertainment is a good thing, but watching a movie consumes a lot less resources than playing games so why are games acceptable? What about VR? VR uses a lot of GPU computations for something a small fraction of people use. Surely people playing VR could use some other form of entertainment that is less resource consuming.

Or then we let people use their own resources the way they see fit.


I would like to redirect you to @africanboy's analysis[1] of how much energy gaming uses. He did it well.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26091220


Gaming uses vastly less energy per person.


> Executives under Frazzini initially rejected charges that New World, an Amazon game that would ask players to colonize a mythical land and murder inhabitants who bear a striking resemblance to Native Americans, was racist. They relented after Amazon hired a tribal consultant who found that the portrayal was indeed offensive

What a ridicilous world we live in.


This is a pretty short comment. Which part do you find ridiculous?


The part where someone would claim this is racist.


> the portrayal was indeed offensive

You seem to have missed that part of your own quote. They're not saying the idea was racist, they're saying the implementation was racist. No doubt is was portraying the natives as wild savages which is indeed racist.


Is it impossible for a game to be racist? If not, how do you know this instance wasn’t racist? Do you know the game better than the people working on it?

This is not people on twitter complaining, these were actual professionals who were a part of the project, I see nothing ridiculous about it.


Sounds like a good usecase for some framework without vdom like Svelte.


Svelte + TS has been very enjoyable for my side project thus far, and I’m more of a systems/compiler dev than any sort of webdev.


Do you have any info on that AAA game? I would be curious to read up on how/why they used svelte.


The appeal is the same as a Vegan burger. If you mimic cheese well enough then why would it not be a pizza?


To be fair, I don't expect vegan burgers to mimic meat any more than I expect chicken to taste of beef. I just need it to taste good and have good texture, staying together when in the pan or on the grill and do well in the bun. I also can't quite remember what most meat tastes like, honestly.


I would imagine it's not a joke. His comment is factual if you interpret "women" and "men" as a population and in context of chess performance(not in general).

> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.


women are not as good as men [generally]

is hardly an argument where it is easy to assume good faith!


I did find a bug in svelte but not sure if it was worth a PR. I cloned their repo, tracked down the issue, learned how their codebase worked, fixed it, wrote some tests for it, wrote an elaborate issue and pull request explaining the issue and nuances. It took around 4-5 hours over a couple of days even though the fix was a one line diff. The PR was ignored for 6 months. I was considering bumping it but then I read in another PR that it's bad manners and just decided to remove it instead.


His arguments for investing in it in 2011 made sense but in 2020 they no longer do.

- Past performance has plateaued for years.

- Use cases are niche instead of regular transactions.

- Since the use cases are niche there is few uptake drivers.


He also in the article nudged people into using MtGox to buy BTC which doesn’t make much sense in hindsight either.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mt._Gox


There was nothing inherently wrong with Mt. Gox as a place to buy BTC. It was trading it and storing it on Gox that got you burned. I lost 0.6 BTC because I was planning on margin trading some but that was only a fraction of my holdings at the time.


what happened to the lost money? it was worth 450 M bucks then. probably a lot more today. was it ever recovered by end users?


goes to show how being early is so important for being successful .


You know it's up 2% today?

You know it has doubled since the bottom this year?

Early my ass.


Cherry picking much? Returns for anything looks awesome if you are comparing it to its bottom. BTC is up 15% this year which is good but nothing to shout about.


Past performance is never a sensible argument for investing


The use case of gold is niche too. Still a worthwhile investment. It's all about trust.


> We'd hate to be treated ourselves as we treat our kids

Sounds like people should treat their kids better


Left to their own devices they make some decisions that harm them. So you have to prevent them but they hate this at the time. What do you do?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: