Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | golfer's commentslogin

These "breaking up with Apple" stories pop up from time to time here. Cracks me up because they all follow the same pattern:

"I'm done with Apple. I've been a Mac user since since $EARLY_YEAR. I loved using $OLD_APPLE_HARDWARE to work on $VARIOUS_INTERESTING_PROJECTS. I fondly recall $FORMATIVE_APPLE_MEMORY.

But they've gone too far. $NEW_APPLE_ENSHITTIFICATION is the last straw, I can't do this any more. This will be hard because $REASONS. But I'm going to adopt $PLATFORM because it's the right thing to do."

Most of them mention Steve Jobs but this one didn't actually.


What is it that bothers you about this type of discussion? For myself I just switched back to Android after a decade of iOS so I'm always interested in what it was that was the last straw for others.

(for me it was interop issues around wearables and trackers; I want to use chipolo and a pebble watch and not feel punished every day for going out of the ecosystem)


It doesn't bother me at all -- in my post, I said it cracks me up. They all have their reasons for breaking up with Apple. FYI I'm not an Apple guy myself.

> what it was that was the last straw for others

CarPlay being actively dangerous if you use it for GPS navigation and someone dares to call you, so the call prompt blocks the entire screen until you either accept or reject the call, was my last straw.

Sure, shit UX and UI is a hassle, but at least it was somewhat consistent. But that the UX department have completely left the building so they're enabling UX that puts people in real life danger? That's the stop I get off at.


"X decides to not use products from Y after longstanding loyalty, because Z"

This is a so generic template that you cannot criticize a post for matching it. It'd be like criticize a story for matching "X happens to Y, leading to Y doing Z which leads to a (happy|unhappy) ending"


The problem is that when they start using $PLATFORM, they realize that it can't do many of the things that they've taken for granted since $EARLY_YEAR.

Wow, this seems to have hit a nerve, based on the early downvotes.

This is very cool, nicely done.

One note: the Property link, that links to the actual news source, is broken.

Also, the test link you're using for Nautilus (the top scoring site) is 404 (https://nautil.us/issue/48/chaos/the-multiverse-as-muse)


This is a very clever idea. Unfortunately I dislike installing extensions, because so many of them seem to get taken over by nefarious owners. Sadly it's poisoned the whole extension platform for me.

FYI: On Youtube, the keyboard shortcut for changing the video speed is simply pressing < or >


Note that this extension is offered on GitHub, not the Chrome Extension store, so if you load it from source it'll never be updated unless you update the code.

I do this for any extension I give big permissions. Rather than installing it from the Chrome extension store, I just download its source and 'load unpacked extension' directly. This method is just a roundabout a way to disable Chrome extension updates. (and of course I'm still trusting the extension's code quite a bit, but at least I don't have to worry about it changing)


and of course I'm still trusting the extension's code quite a bit, but at least I don't have to worry about it changing

You only need to examine and trust it once.


It's true, but for large extensions that make use of bundled 3rd party libraries, it's hard to examine the code to determine with very high confidence there's nothing malicious in it. I also tend to watch a new extension's network traffic, but of course it's not foolproof either.

I delete the third party libraries and replace them with my own clean checkouts.

This extension appears to be installed directly from the files - I don't think it would automatically update even if a nefarious owner later gained control of the repository.

Actually the shortcut for changing the video speed is typing `>` or `<`. If you simply press those keys, depending on your keyboard layout, you may only show the controls (if the video is playing) or advance forward/back a frame (if the video is paused).

Early in my career I worked at a place where the sales people would half-joke about signing deals on December 40th -- to claim it in the previous quarter/year.

December 40th is last day of Q5.

A company in incredible turmoil. Would not want to be there now. Morale must be brutal.


Almost everyone says turmoil and bad morale is the default at Meta. The default is lots of turf-protection, project stealing, and backstabbing. It will probably get worse with these news coming out.

Recently I've also heard of teams having very little amount of time to prove themselves before they get reorg'ed - which might be one of the reasons that their progress on AI has been slow.

The only person I know that is happy at Meta is someone who works at one of the acquisitions. That specific acquisition doesn't seem to have been infected by Meta's culture too much for now.

I just hope other CEOs don't see this and get antsy about following suit.


It was always rough, but this is by far the worst I've ever seen or heard. The thrash and org maneuvering are feral.


I'd say this post reads more like them beating their chest about how great their improvements are.


Indeed, open source exists despite Microsoft trying its hardest to kill it. Microsoft was (and still is) a ruthless, savage competitor. Their image has softened as of late but I'll never forget the BS they did under Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer.


I blame Yahoo's Jerry Yang for normalizing this silly writing technique.


Awesome to see golf related projects on HN! Nice work.


Thank you. Glad you liked it.


If you read the article, Google says they hired a professional voice actor to create the NotebookLM voice. I'm sure this will come to light in the lawsuit.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: