It's a product that offers a vibe coding service to users. You enter a text prompt for what you want to build (no-code), and it tries to build it.
I don't know if these 8 people vibe coded the vibe coding product itself -- they may have. But in the title the reference to "vibe coder" refers to their product.
The technical term is constrained decoding. OpenAI has had this for almost a year now. They say it requires generating some artifacts to do efficiently, which slows down the first response but can be cached.
The browser is a sandbox with a bunch of discoverable features. Those features exist for the user but a side effect is they leak data which individually is probably not interesting but collectively is a fingerprint.
To be less of a fingerprint you'd need to remove JS from the entire web.
Neat idea. This probably has the disadvantage of coupling deployment to a service. For example how do you scale up or red/green (you'd need the thing that does this to be aware of the push).
Edit: that thing exists it is uncloud. Just found out!
That said it's a tradeoff. If you are small, have one Hetzner VM and are happy with simplicity (and don't mind building images locally) it is great.
Yes! We lived in a penthouse apartment in Surry Hills (the old hat factory) for 2 years from 2010 and the first time the choppers came in and dropped troops off on the rooftop opposite I was terrified! Became a regular source of entertainment, to sit on the terrace watching them be dropped off
I worked in that area a while back. It is (was then) a quiet part of Sydney just commercial offices and business that supports it. Despite being a fairly central location. It's a beautiful place to hang out you can walk to harbour views.
Looks like you are putting a derivative behind a paywall though, no? I think quid pro quo let pudiklubi publish your work too? Some kind of open license?
> Nope. Just that 1. Is better than people. 2. Isn't better than people. Pick one!
That's too coarse of a choice. It's better than people at increasingly large number of distinct tasks. But it's not good enough to recursively self-improve just yet - though it is doing it indirectly: it's useful enough to aid researchers and businesses in creating next generation of models. So in a way, the recursion and resulting exponent are already there, we're just in such early stages that it looks like linear progress.
Thanks. Your nuanced version is better. In that version I can still ignore most of LinkedIn and Twitter and assume there will still be a need for people. Not just at OMGAD (OpenAI...) but at thousands of companies.