Sure it's end-to-end encrypted.. But Facebook doesn't have to get in the middle to look at your messages. Facebook is sitting at both ends, reading the messages after they are decrypted. It is already monetizing these messages and the ads are shown in Facebook instead of Whatsapp. Whether the opt-out functionality for this feature is honored properly by Facebook I'm not sure.
> And the open question is what they learned in the process
They were the biggest corporate sponsors to open source and also Linux kernel in the past few years. They acquired github, the biggest place for open source devs to meet and contribute code, and promise to keep it independent. How open of a question is this really?
Really? I hate skype for business because I can't copy-paste any body of text to co-worker because it gives a dialog box saying "the message is too big to send".. I don't know a single IM app that does this. Apparently I'm in 1980s.
Almost all of those checks tend to happen after the fact and lead to transactions getting rolled back, rather than being checked in advance.
(Whether that's a desirable approach is a reasonable question, but that's already a thing that happens today. The only thing that needs checking in advance is "is there enough money".)
If Bitcoin can do it in 10 minutes globally, we can do it faster in a centralized system.
Edit: ... Not to mention many other developed nations' banking systems.
Edit: Not sure about the downvotes, but really- please don't pretend sending money instantly within one country is rocket science. The reason we're in this mess is mostly banks wanting to hang onto float, and legacy. Both our neighbors to the north and south have much speedier internal banking systems than we do, as do countless other countries.
How do you query the card balance and transfer the funds? Do you actually get cash out of the card, or do you have to resell it as a store credit to someone else?
I imagine Office, VS etc are too big to "port" to Appstore model. Also people still use these applications in Windows 7 and so that would mean having two parallel versions of the same app and release features and support for both.
The distinction of what makes a "true UWP app" certainly gets blurrier with the "Centennial" desktop bridge, but it's still rather more "true UWP" than AppV is/was.