Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cramer4next's commentslogin

Yeah, making electric cars too is on odd fit given your rational. Kinda like having a Tesla and an F-150 in the same driveway. I must be MAGA too.

I'm from the same background of contractors. This stuff happens all the time and is nothing unqiue to Tesla. The regular anti: Musk, Ellison and Zuckerberg crowd out with their drums and masks again.

> The regular anti: Musk, Ellison and Zuckerberg crowd out with their drums and masks again.

You understand that if you left this sentence out of your comment it'd read as absolutely reasonable, right? With that addition it verges on inflammatory for no added purpose whatsoever to the message.


I was not aware of that. Nothing inflammatory here. Its the general counter to sediment of here. If it was solar city it wouldn't even have 2 points. What makes this so different then any other product cancellation? One word, "Musk". Its a trigger word for a small majority of the population.

What is a "small majority"? Freudian slip?

Your reading too deep. A small majority is a group of individuals that attempt to speak for masses when in fact their statements or beliefs are non-reflective of the majority. Its like that experiment they do with a group of children where they tell 9 out of 10 children to say 2+2=5 and the 10th child just goes along with it by answer 5 too. Either because they want to fit in or they are just angry and want to belong. Forced conformency for being the odd person out when surrounded by the "small majority".

You're thinking of the phrase "vocal minority".

Five years ago I'd agree with you, but in the current climate "minority" has negative connotations associated with it. E.g. a deminished value of opinion and lack of representation. Thus "small majority" has become more palatable and socially acceptable.

> One word, "Musk". Its a trigger word for a small majority of the population

Well…it is fashionable to hate all things Elon.


Whats wrong with Larry? Why would anyone instinctively down vote 141k employees world wide?

People in this forum have... Opinions on Oracle / Larry Ellison. See e.g., https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15886728


A source close to the situation told me they're called "Freedom Fighters" in Canada. Can anyone confirm?


This was the fact i found interesting:

"The situation “did not involve a sandbox escape or a sophisticated cyber action,” the company said, adding that “there are no current open issues.”

Past articles were pointing to this being some unknown escape.


Those past articles were likely about the Hugging Face hack, not the incidents involving this company.

From https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol...: "Editor’s Note: These are separate from the Hugging Face security incident, and we will continue to share updates on the Hugging Face incident here."


The key metric on this will be YUM reported earnings tomorrow. This should be a good indication if this is really impacting peoples habits.


Its a failure in the U.S. because the bet is on solid state batteries. Personally I won't take the EV plunge until they have those. The only exception for me to not wait would be the 10k BYD car. At that price point and it lasted 3 years i'd be happy.


The constraints and priorities for EVs and grid storage are very different.

In a car it’s worth paying more for higher volumetric and gravitational density. For aircraft even more so.

For grid storage, physical space is usually not the largest issue. Cost of deployment, stability, and cycle life are bigger factors.


This is for grid storage, not EVs.


The article is about grid storage, but grids can also use solid state and battery tech is shared between different usecases. My point was where the bet is.

QuantumScape is a good example as it entered into agreements with opertors for their battery tech.

Good article on solid state for the grid: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2025/ph240/mann2/


The solid-state batteries with lithium do not have any significant advantage for having a solid electrolyte, but their advantage is in having an anode made of pure lithium, instead of lithium intercalated inside some electrode material.

This greatly increases the energy density, which is very important for a mobile application, but this has little importance for stationary applications, where not the energy per mass or per volume is important, but the energy per dollar.

Moreover, for stationary electric grid applications, besides the cost, the lifetime is extremely important. As mentioned by others, the companies which provide electric energy want lifetimes of the order of 30 years, which can be ensured with sodium batteries.

For now, the main factor that has prevented the use of the lithium batteries with solid electrolytes is the short lifetimes.

There are good chances that we will see cars with lithium batteries with solid electrolytes, but I do not believe that such batteries will ever be used for high-energy stationary applications.


Nobody in their right mind would put Na-ion batteries in an EV. The lawsuits would never stop. It would be worse than Asbestos lawsuits.


Ridiculous statement without any evidence. CATL and Changan Automotive are already making and putting them in EVs.

https://electrek.co/2026/02/05/first-sodium-ion-battery-ev-d...

Sodium ion batteries are safer than Lithium ion or LFP batteries and also perform better in very cold temperatures.


I think you need to start backing up your claims. (And no, beautiful, clean coal won't cut it.)


I think people should start flagging his posts. Obviously he's not here to participate in good faith.


Certainly giving strong Taylor Sheridan Landman ranting against windmills vibe, with a twist of bad chemistry and bias against batteries thrown in for good measure.


I love Landman. Thanks for throwing in a mention on that.


Receipts please. This is counter to everything I've read about the technology.


Can you expand on this? How can you board a flight without realID for $45?


It is called "TSA ConfirmID". https://www.tsa.gov/tsaconfirm-id

"If you are unable to provide the required acceptable ID, such as a passport or REAL ID, you can pay a $45 fee to use TSA ConfirmID. TSA will then attempt to verify your identity so you can go through security; however, there is no guarantee TSA can do so."

From https://thepointsguy.com/news/tsa-security-with-confirmid/ :

"TSA agents pull you aside for secondary screenings and to verify your identity. ... After looking me up in his system, [the supervisor] asked me a series of questions only I could answer (previous addresses and that sort of thing)."


Have you been to an airport yet since it became mandatory? They actually have signs around stating it. I had similar thoughts as the GP about that.


Not for roughly the last 6 months. I have been using my passport because my old drivers license doesn't expire until next year. I'll have to look closer or read the signs then. Just never noticed that.


Yeah, I've been using my Nexus card, but I've flown with people who forgot their passport and didn't have RealID and they just have you go to a website, pay $45, and show them you've paid and you're on your way. It's very secure :)


I'd like to see the study go farther with a specific consumed content breakdown. For example somone who watches Jimmy Kimmel vs someone who watches Dateline nightly. How much impact does the content affect the brain rot?


Mind blowing how Bonnie Tylers death gets 339 up votes and a U.S. Senator dies and gets a culmination of less then 100.

Src: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843438

And here I thought hacker news was was made up of the smartest people in room.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: