FTE is a TLA.

Can QuickJS be compiled to WASM and executed in WASM sandbox?

"I don't know who they are, but their attorney is Mark Zuckerberg".

I would suggest to keep initial particles' color -- it would be easier to understand the system's evolution.

That's more than Google donated to Rust Foundation in 2025 (though it donated $1M in 2024).

Russia tries to push its population to "alternatives" like Rutube(sic!) and VK Video by interfering into network connectivity (they call it "slowing down", they just drop fraction of packets that goes from YouTube servers), but it seems the success is quite limited.

Have you heard an anecdote about the cat and the mustard?

C was designed to be compiled with a single-pass compiler.

It wasn't; the original C compiler had two passes, and built expression trees in the first pass which the second pass would turn into assembly (and the original as on UNIX also had two passes).

C was not designed at all. It evolved from B, by adding types to it.

Yes.

And B evolved from BCPL:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCPL

I had read the book about BCPL by Martin Richards, creator of the language. it was quite interesting. IIRC, after describing the language, he gave some examples of small system software routines or utilities, written in it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Richards_(computer_sc...

Ok, you need to call `jj bookmark set -r@ XYX` (or `jj b s -r@ XYX`), so what?

They're not quite the same thing as named branches in Git. In jj, a branch is a chain of commits. This chain of commits cannot be named. It's possible to create a bookmark, which is a name for a particular commit, and it's possible to use that bookmark to refer to a branch of commits (e.g. jj rebase's -b flag), but this is different from naming a branch like you would in git.

This is a subtle difference, and most of the time it doesn't matter at all, but in this case there is a difference between how bookmarks work in jj, and how branches work in git.

Such nice community.. I think I’ll stick to git, even though Torvalds isn’t the nicest person in the world

I'm replying to a comment that starts with accusation: "False.". My point is that correct version differs just by a single word. It can be just a tipo in Disposal8433's comment, not "false".

Some people will look anywhere to justify their stubborn refusal to try new things. I wouldn't get too upset by it

I agree the parent is being a bit rude, but also, Linus hasn’t been involved in git for years, just fyi.

Don't base your opinion on some idiotic comments on HN, they are probably not part of a "community". Just try it, it's a legit super good tool.

An airport.

Perhaps, "Deep Work" by Cal Newport can explain that.