I'm confused, is this meant to be presented as new work? Windows has done this for a very long time.

I found it very opaquely worded the whole way through. I think the work being presented is simply an implementation of the technique in eduos, but short of going and reading the paper I don’t know.

It’s a bachelor’s thesis.

"There is only a single reference5 dated to 2010 indicating that Microsoft might use a similar approach for its NT kernel."

Googling for it brings up a ton of results.

How does this differ from Invisagig?

What a load of ableist bullshit. Guess what, you can have autism, ADHD and anxiety and still be really fucking clever. The article starts with the premise that they are incompatible.

They both offer virtualized guests under a hypervisor host. EC2 does have more offload specialization hardware but for the most part they are functionally equivalent, unless I'm missing something...

Yes, the negativity is infuriating. This is the mindset that is going to get left behind. I'm no LLM maximalist but they clearly have their uses in the right context and the right hands.

" Run Any App: If it runs on Windows, it can run on WinBoat. Enjoy the full range of Windows applications as native OS-level windows in your Linux environment"

Bold claim. Lets see it run Fortnite with anti-cheat.

128MB? Quantization has come a long way!

I think they mis-spoke 128GB* :)

Wishful thinking there on my part.

Though technically < 1GB is enough - one had offload it to the SSD, albeit with very slow speeds!

There’s actually a large amount of women in the DMC FB group. Everyone is welcome.

Why would John Carmack who is so rich that he does things for shits, giggles and personal development, give a hoot what a VC cares about?

GLQuake was released 11 months before Quake 2.