what happens when you go too far from trusting what you see/read/hear on the internet? simple logic gets tossed out like a baby in the bathwater.
now, here's the rig I'd love to see with this: take a hundred of them and position them like a bug's eye to see what could be done with that. there'd be so much overlapping coverage that 3D would be possible, yet the parallax would be so small that makes me wonder how much depth would be discernible
There's a 0% chance of a successful colony, by any definition of successful, on Mars in the next century. If we, as a species, cannot avoid destroying the climate that birthed us over millions of years we have exactly 0% chance of surviving one that is completely inhospitable to life.
You can't learn rocket science if you are too retarded to wipe your ass. So that 0% came from this unwiped ass. Mars colony is impossible, humans are just less retarded monkeys.
There's no chance of a colony of any kind. The bare minimum requirement would be to end dependence on shipping critical materials from Earth, and good luck with making that happen in the next century.
I'm not following. Are you saying that a colony by definition has to be self-sustaining? Why?
At this stage of globalization, what part of Earth is self-sustaining? How certain are you that if the US was suddenly blocked from importing any goods that it would not descend into chaos?
I'm not saying it has to be by definition, but the costs and complications in regularly transporting oxygen, water, food and everything else in cargo ships from Earth simply makes such a colony unrealistic even for a very small number of permanent settlers.
This speech by Colonel Jessep is meant to be revealing of his true thoughts and character. Jessep rationalizes the evil and immoral acts he commits or orders because he's "protecting" the rest of society. He lied to cover up his own malfeasance. A soldier died under his command, murdered, as a direct consequence of illegal orders he gave.
How do you completely twist the plot of this movie to arrive at the conclusion that Colonel Jessep's worldview is one to be admired instead of reviled?
For a mainstream Hollywood film, "A Few Good Men" is quite nuanced. Colonel Jessup's actions are plainly illegal, and in the end he is arrested for them, but his point still has merit: society must be protected, and perhaps necessarily, it is protected by people who must do things that society would disapprove of. The actual courtroom proceedings of the movie are less interesting than the philosophical debate, and ultimately one can admire both viewpoints.
The whole quote can be boiled down to "the ends justify whatever means I want them to".
Yet the key takeaway relative to today's world is this - society needs to know what measures are being taken on their dime to ensure their "freedom" (loaded term), as they, as taxpayers, are indeed on the hook for reparations of any and all kinds. The US military destabilized Iraq and Afghanistan and spent untold billions if not trillions trying to rebuild it - yet I have a strong feeling that the Colonels, Generals, etc... didn't liquidate their stock portfolios to fund such an operation - they took that money from taxpayers.
The Colonel doesn't personally pay for the damages to society he caused - that's the taxpayer's job, and they should be, in his mind, grateful for that. But what he misses is that society at large has no time for people who think like that - that's why he's the bad guy. He doesn't care about the risks, and claims we should happily accept whatever comes next because in his mind, he's helping defend the country.
People will just keep using it. But you might be right that it is a net negative since it's mostly used for speculation... But, it's not completely useless (tell that to the criminals who use it regularly). Or people who own it because they don't want all their assets in a highly inflationary currency.
> Or people who own it because they don't want all their assets in a highly inflationary currency.
When compared to world currencies BTC currently has an inflation rate that makes it the second most inflationary currency in the world after Venezuela. As a store of value crypto is not great.
What's your math on that? Current block reward is 6.25 BTC which occurs on average every 10 minutes. That's 52594 BTC per year. The max outstanding BTC is 21M (there are currently just over 19M) so that would be less than 0.25% annual inflation. Pretty sure there aren't many currencies (if any) that are at that rate, even before the current high inflation rates.
If you're factoring in the price, over the last decade, it has been one of the best (if not the best) performing asset, so I think from that perspective it's actually deflationary.
You’re confusing money supply with inflation. Bitcoins supply is incredibly constrained, and yet it is inflating at an incredible rate. This is the opposite of what is happening in Zimbabwe where supply is not constrained at all and inflation is lower than what bitcoin is at YTD.
Inflation is a measure of how much goods and services you can get for a given unit of currency. It is not a measure of how much currency exists, although it can be affected by that.
My math is that you need three bitcoins to buy what one bitcoin got you 6 months ago. That is an inflation rate of 600% per year. The world is losing its mind right now because good currencies are inflating at 8% instead of 3%.
On the whole, yes bitcoin is a high reward investment, if you bought it at the right time. It tends to inflate and deflate pretty wildly.
All that means is that, according to most economic consensus, it is a very bad currency. Deflation isn’t a good trait in a currency since it incentivizes saving over using capital to create economic activity. Deflation also tends to favor those who have money, and makes borrowing money a bad idea, which also suppresses economic activity. Massive inflation is bad too, for obvious reasons.
You want your currency to be predictable and stable. A slight amount of inflation is, by conventional economic standards, a good thing.
Yeah I definitely cherry picked a convenient time period. But the point is that most people want a stable currency. Predictability is a good thing with money. Bitcoin has never been stable or predictable.
A deflationary currency (like long term bitcoin) is great personally, since why wouldn't I want my money to be worth more tomorrow than it is today. But in the macro sense, we really don't want that. If my personal money is worth more as each day goes by, my incentive isn't to go out and spend it on useful economic activity. The incentive is to hoard your money and spend as little as possible right now since things will get cheaper the longer you wait to spend. Deflation is a situation where the rich get richer by doing nothing.
So from a societal perspective a currency that deflates over time, like bitcoin, is a currency that discourages spending, discourages economic activity, and concentrates wealth into the hands of those who already have large reserves of capital and don't invest it into new ventures.
Bitcoin might make a good investment, as you pointed out it is up 1000x in 10 years. But that volatility is what makes it a poor currency. That rise was unpredictable, and for every huge deflationary period (price rise), has had an almost as big inflationary period.
You're right, currently the volatility and deflationary aspect does incentivize its use more as an investment than a currency, but there are some unique aspects which make it more desirable as a currency. For example,
No foreign exchange required. It is decentralized so no need to exchange it with any 3rd party.
Flat transaction fees. You can transfer $1B of value to anyone in the world for a buck. How else would you do that?
Theft protection. It's as safe as you want to keep your private key, you can even use multisig to get other people involved.
Privacy. There are many methods to make it anonymous, untraceable so others don't know you own it, how much you own, or what you spend it on.
You're playing a semantic game here. Yes, technically if criminals are using it, it's not "useless". To the rest of us, it's actually worse than useless because the criminal activity is a net negative on society.
The idea that crypto is a hedge against inflation is laughable, look at any of the price activity in the last few months. Crypto tokens have no fundamentals or inherent value or anything. The price is completely random.
I'm not condoning all the illegal stuff that happens with Bitcoin, to be clear, but just because a government says something is illegal, doesn't mean it should be. For example we're happy in the U.S. (well most of us I think) to be freed from oppressive rulers who taxed without representation, and something like Bitcoin would have been quite useful in that situation. There are many countries who are in a similar situation.
So... what happens when the person who originally deployed everything eventually leaves or gets hit by a bus? Hey, it's six months later and you need to redeploy everything again.
You need some automation or a really good how-to document, and hopefully both. It won't save you all the pain of learning how the deployment works but it will save you a lot of time and effort.
I had a port-knocking ssh OpenBSD setup late 90's, did move the port about though, just white listed opened. Used SKEY for port sequence, was easy to run even on a Nokia in Java() in that era.
[EDIT ADD]>Actually was some Symbian and then Java implementation of the skey. Had Psion Series 5 used initially.
Even if your bodies are pretty similar, you still don't know if your vitamin D levels will follow the pattern that his did. If you're messing with vitamin D supplements you should talk to a doctor and/or get your blood tested.
