And it's been that way since their very first comment was flagged dead in 2017. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15858411 If you write to the contact email address (at the bottom of the page here), maybe they'll unban you.
And from the first quote, which I strongly agree with, it follows that when people leave the company after building something together, the organization is losing something invaluable. I am baffled that this is not understood and I have witnessed first hand how great teams that are able to work well together collapse and the company has to rebuild the knowledge, wasting time and money.
I suspect most of the time that's because you can't justify keeping a team idle for even a week between projects if that's what it takes to ready the next project for them to work on. I'd be surprised if most businesses even allowed a day of idleness to get a running start with a well-functioning team.
I had a friend who worked as a project manager for a major telecom and their policy was to basically furlough her for a few weeks (paid time off) after a major project winds down. She's there if something bad happens, but otherwise it's downtime (and retained experience!) before the next project. It seems like a sensible and healthy policy.
Which is why the concept of 20% time is important. It means that 1 day a week your manager can't tell you what to do, so you can work on whatever you think is most important. You could use that time to work on what your manager wants, and most do, but if you have things that you feel are more important you just go and do them.
Great to hear that! I got myself the last Intel based mbp 16" fully jacked with R5600 HMB2 memory, as this is the last one that will run Windows, which I need often. I also need larger screen, so I'm waiting for M2 or M3 generation, that will inevitably come with 16" screen factor - looking forward to that amazing machine in a few years!
This aligns exactly with my experience. The body is very reluctant to turn into fat reserves, as they the best source of energy and must be conserved. As you said, exercise helps, and another trick to eat some carbs every three or so days to convince your body to start burning fat.
Presumably by giving the signal that "food is available" and the system can break out of the hypocaloric energy preservation state. The problem is that the fat deposits are extremely valuable (in a non overweight person) and as one enters a hypocaloric state they become more valuable. I.e your body will rather throttle down metabolism and energy levels farther than start breaking down the fat for energy. Eating some carbs can healp to break this pattern.
I don't think the body works like that. After you eat carbs, your insulin level goes up and the cells get the glucose in them. If there's more than they can take, it is put into the adipose tissue as fat. Eating carbs once every 3 days is in no way telling the body that there is enough food, quite the contrary actually (all this is just my opinion).
This carb refeed reset "tricks" your leptide hormones to burning through energy reserves rather than putting the body through a catatonic (muscle burning) state. This is why the "Cheat" meal or day is an important step to sustaining body fat loss through elongated periods.
It's also completely against human nature, especially when it comes to raising kids. We have always lived in large groups and kids were nurtured by and brought up by many members of family, instead of just father and mother. It results in much healthier humans, who learned from all members of family, because who's to say that father and mother themselves only are best guardians? Not to mention the sheer amount of effort required to take care of a child, which was shared by much larger extended family or just tribe members. Today's nuclear family mostly brings mental issues and overburdens the parents in an unnatural way.
After going through a few of these, I'm coming to the same conclusions. Even though I enjoyed some of these, I hate the entire process, mostly for the time consuming aspect of it. You're going through a series of stages, each taking time and causing you to be on edge, and then waiting a couple of weeks for an answer that end it suddenly, just like that. I'm too old for this shit. I want to have an two way street conversation and technical discussion to determine if I can be a good fit for a position and maybe if interest is on both sides, continue on technical discussion on the merits of the job, rather than writing code in an online document.
Sadly, most big well know valley companies are doing the leetcode obstacle course, because there are many many applying for the highest salaries in the industry. I can't see it changing anytime soon.
The problem is this is a slippery slope. Where does it end? Today it's "master", tomorrow someone will be offended by something else. Do we need to accomodate every offended person? I don't think so. This is insanity.
Some people just have too much time on their hands. And it doesn't help that media is spreading this, as it generates clicks which in turn generates money. As such, total non-issues will be made an issue.
The thing is, it's not even "mass" insanity. Working people who are busy with a family and such don't really post on social media, as they simply have no time. This creates a pretty large divide between the internet and real life. Though, I say this as someone not being part of the tech world which is more closely connected with social media.
On a first glance, it does look like a simpler version of Rust, and I say it without demeaning Zig. Looks very promising, I'll be keeping an eye for it.
yes! I'm surprised how many people are ok with these. This is also the biggest problem with streaming, in addition to input latency.