Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bmcarr's commentslogin

1. Admit it. You're out of the hardware game. Outsource your hardware production, or scrap it entirely, to compete more directly with Microsoft without the liability of manufacturing boxes.

Very first one, lol. I agree that many are spot on, but coupling Mac software to its hardware is part of how they make such good products, not to mention the plethora of innovative hardware devices that have made them the richest company in the world.


All of Apple's hardware products are now made by outsourced contract manufacturers. They're still all designed by Apple obviously but I thought this point was spot on.


Are the entire products outsourced, or just the componenets?

Either way, I think this suggestion is implying that Apple stop selling hardware and instead just sell software that runs on other peoples' hardware (it's the "compete more directly with Microsoft" bit that leads me to believe this is what they meant).


Virtually all products are outsourced. Apple owns no factories and employs no assembly line workers.

Instead it's formed deep partnerships with certain contract manufacturers (Foxconn). When it wants to pioneer a certain manufacturing technique, it will simply make a large capital expenditure to make the tooling available to the contract manufacturer. Never however will it actually be responsible for the actual manufacturing and assembly of its devices.

This is Tim Cook's doing and it's the model for just about every OEM you see today, from Apple to Xiaomi. Samsung and LG are notable exceptions because they are component manufacturers who became OEMs afterwards.

Edit: There might be some iMac assembly done in the United States, but this is likely using a US-based contract manufacturer as well.


Yes, hardware building is largely outsourced, but it's not Dell-style outsourced, where the contract manufacturer does a considerable part of the design. Today's Apple products probably have less generic design in them than 1997 Apple products, and more control by Apple.


And the award for least descriptive commit log of all time goes to...

Cool stuff though.


Eh, when you're doing writing rather than coding, sometimes it's hard to be more descriptive than "added more text." I have a few repositories where I don't care much about the "logic" of the history, but I just want things versioned. (e.g. a folder full of text files with random ideas jotted down.) My commit commands tend to look like,

    git commit -m "`date`"


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: