Seems to me like Apple was more innovative when they had fewer employees and fewer resources, so perhaps we should break up the company in order to increase innovation.
Buying 1 Mibps means you can use up to 1Mibps. Paying $/GiB means you can use 100s of Gibps for a split second and only pay the $/GiB fee.
In the past i did a TCO comparison for a large spikey workload where the $/GiB cost even at list was cheaper than allocating enough bandwidth for peak events.
At small scale the $/Mibps likely comes out cheaper, but for any large company sitting on 100s of Gibps of excess capacity for an event that occurs once or twice a year, or a few hours per day is very costly and might eat up savings from p99/p95th billing.
In a way that's the case with every company. Each part is more valuable on it's own, unless it's more valuable together with another part. :P
btw, it looks like you have some sort of shadowban. I don't see any terrible comments among your last 20 or so, so you might want to ask @dang if he can look into your case.
It's users, as a percentage of mobile phone users (80% of population). So if a family have one iPhone, they can all count as users.
iPhone only bring affordable to richer people who mostly want the latest means lots of second hand items. I'll warrant Android users at the lower end keep their phones longer.
I think they are also trying to balance not losing money since there's no egress charges for data coming out of the Outpost and into the customer's data center. I imagine for some use cases, that cannibalizes some revenue.
It might be worth the hit, but naive to think such an accomplishment is without innovation cost.