They released it, and look what happened. It WAS too dangerous.

Chrome takes up a few gigs on windows for no good reason anyway, mostly caching of websites you went to one time

> You have been on this page for 92 seconds. You scrolled 0% of the way down. You never left this tab.

Uhm... how did I get to the bottom if I scrolled 0%?

Actually it's closer to https://youtube.com/@dave2d who is a popular tech YouTuber

Huh, I also thought the same

That is what I thought of too. Almost live David is a popular name or something... /s

Maybe he should change his name so it's not confused with a popular video codec.

maybe I'm being dense, but why do people keep reinventing markdown to make it more like HTML when HTML exists?

Easier to read, easier to write. On top of that, Quarkdown runs compile-time logic and scripting.

no AI could ever be so poetic. nice

> In Germany, people complain when the train is late. Everywhere else, the train is just late.

You think people don't complain when the train is late in other countries? That's hardly a uniquely German thing

To be honest, I complain more often when the train is on time.

I am German, not autistic.

This confuses me as I have never been to Germany and do not speak German.

But rules are rules.

There's a German word for that: Deutschgeistlichveranlagt.

Do you have German heritage or live in an area that had a large number of German immigrants at one point?

hah, no, not even a bit.

So you’re not German?

not necessarily, my kids have citizenship of my home country while daughter never lived there and son only for a year, and for none of them it's their mother tongue

I am not. But I guess I'd fit right in. If I could speak German

So ist der Geist!

It's always funny to see people try speaking/writing german and screw it up in four words/14 characters :-)

I got 38% german, 58% autistic btw.

> This class of bug seems to be in the harness, not in the model itself. It’s somehow labelling internal reasoning messages as coming from the user, which is why the model is so confident that “No, you said that.”

from the article.

I don't think the evidence supports this. It's not mislabelling things, it's fabricating things the user said. That's not part of reasoning.