Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | arethuza's commentslogin

"America expanded into land that was sparsely populated"

What does this remind you of?


My own favourite - the Last Ent of Affric:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Ent_of_Affric


TIL: The UK designates "trees of special national interest", and has a "Tree of the Year" competition:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_the_Year_(United_Kingd...


"There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning."

Warren Buffet

https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/business/yourmoney/26ever...


THIS

There is an incredibly good minute-by-minute account of the Cuban crisis: "One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War" - it covers a lot of areas that aren't often mentioned such as the U2 flight at the North Pole going astray or the Soviet nuclear cruise missile teams targetting Guantanamo that taken together with the more well known events make it seem remarkable to me that we survived.

In first 20 minutes of the documentary The Fog of War Robert McNamara goes over the Cuban missile crisis in detail. Even he admits it came down to luck.

His meeting with Cuba in the 90s and the new information presented that McNamara didn’t have during the crisis was especially sobering. McNamara ended the meeting early because he was “unprepared” to learn there were missiles already operational and authorization was already granted to launch if the Cuban build sites were struck.


Didn't watch it. So what about the million dollar question: would nuclear (or global) war have started if the US didn't have nuclear weapons? I mean, it's the basis of the US nuclear strategy after all.

It only takes one soldier to down an incoming US transport aircraft with a MANPAD?

MANPADS are designed to be used against small CAS aircraft. Attacking large transport aircraft effectively requires a considerably larger air defense system. That also assumes you can move a MANPADS within range; the US already controls a large military airfield on Greenland.

Ok, and then what happens, Sun Tzu?

The end of the US as we know it happens. Sure the US could win a war ("win"), but the US without US Europe trade, EU turning to China as its main trading partner including in military equipment, no more bases in EU, less access to other parts of the world, and so on. That would be a US that would wither and die.

I have no idea - nothing good, that's clear.

Which is one reason why it reminds me of the Falklands War - with the USA in the role of Argentina.

Fun fact: the first ship sunk was built and launched as USS Phoenix.

Isn't there a rather large country mostly in the way between the USA and Greenland?

I'm sure Canada cares about what's happening, but planes and ships don't need to cross Canadian borders to get to Greenland.

Worth noting that Diocletian's retirement "villa" was actually a massive palace that still forms the heart of the city of Split in Croatia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diocletian%27s_Palace


Please tell me that first typo was intentional...

""independent"" (not) nuclear deterrent"

We really are in a weird state of dependency with the US regarding deterrence - missiles sourced from US stocks, UK nuclear material built into warheads using a US design.

I wonder if there is a block in the missiles to stop them being used against the US?

Edit: I don't think there is any dependency on the US once a UK Trident sub is at sea - for the simple reason there no external dependencies (no codes or anything) - the crews have all they need to launch.


I have wondered about this. Would we know there aren't any radio receivers that might pick up a signal from satellites saying, nuh-uh, not this way?

> I wonder if there is a block in the missiles to stop them being used against the US?

When test firing gets into the news, it's because it has the opposite problem and goes towards the US.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: