Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | antonkochubey's commentslogin

if you use \which it'll always be a shell built-in ;) though someone can put a different shell in your .zshrc

  $ which() { echo foo; }
  $ \which
  foo
The backslash only prevents alias expansion.

`exec /tmp/fake-bash` in bashrc to intercept everything?

rootless docker's networking (slirp4netns) is still terribly buggy and in edge cases often locks up using 100% CPU until you discover that your laptop is a lapwarmer and kill it

I found it pretty reliable and use it across all my docker projects, development and production.

If it was running Windows - no wonder, Windows is horrible at constantly writing … something to disk, and eMMC's are not high endurance devices. The flash itself had nothing to do with Chuwi and was most likely manufactured by either SanDisk or Kingston, it would have failed likewise in ASUS/Lenovo/whoever else made those crap Intel Atom + 4 GB RAM + 64 GB eMMC devices.

it was running linux and it died within the first few months of barely any use. i don't know what vendor the eMMC came from but they chose it.

Enterprises are paying 500% - 20000% markup for AWS services so why do you think 5% will be a problem?

not really, the redirect itself is happening at EMV DS level, not by the merchant himself. Merchant has no idea what bank your card belongs to, so he does not know which bank to redirect you to.

non-3DS payments are trivial to chargeback, at least in the EU

In America all payments are trivial to chargeback anyways.

We ought to have liability shifting. A long time ago there was a liability shift where if a merchant uses the magnetic stripe on a card equipped with a chip, then the merchant is unconditionally liable in case of a chargeback. We just needed merchants to be liable when the bank supported 3DSecure but the merchant chose not to use it.


They are everywhere. Default liability for online payments is and has always been with the merchant; only 3DS and some wallets can shift it to the issuer.

It’s not like that proposal offers a solution for any of those problems.


Renault is not a part of Stellantis.


Does amount of land usable for farming have to be halved in a decade for you to be concerned?


Are they perhaps “what the amp repair guys know how to work on” for the reason that they require repairs much more often? :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: