Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | angst's commentslogin

“Today you pardoned the founder of Binance,” Collins began. “Can you explain why you chose to pardon him, and did it have anything to do with his involvement in your family's —

“Which one, who was that?” Trump asked.

“The founder of Binance,” Collins continued. “He has involvement in your own family’s crypto business.”

“The recent one? I believe we’re talking about the same person, because I do pardon a lot of people,” Trump said. “I don’t know. He was recommended by a lot of people. A lot of people say that — Are you talking about the crypto person? A lot of people say he wasn’t guilty of anything, he served four months in jail, and they say that he wasn’t guilty of anything.”

As Collins attempted to clarify, Trump jumped in, saying, “Well, you don’t know much about crypto — you know nothing about nothing, you fake news!”

Trump then continued answering the question.

“He was somebody, as I was told — I don’t believe I have ever met him — but I’ve been told he had a lot of support. And they said what he did is not even a crime. That he was persecuted by the Biden administration. And so I gave him a pardon at the request of some very good people.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-scolds-kaitlan-col...


Thanks for clarification, but it sounds quite true to me if I'm reading "Maybe Google will try to ban them, maybe they won't." correctly...


Garage should support partial content seeking via its HTTP interface, if it is S3 API compatible which includes support for range requests/206 Partial Content response.


Several users that own a Mac Studio with Apple's M3 Ultra chip have reported that their desktop cannot install macOS 26 Tahoe, the latest version of macOS. This is apparently due to a bug that may relate to an inability to properly recognize the machine's neural engine.


> There is an increasing crowd of people who ask a large language model to "find a problem in curl, make it sound terrible", then send the result, which is never correct, to the project, thinking that they are somehow helping.

Our worst nightmares are becoming true indeed..


>thinking that they are somehow helping

>Our worst nightmares are becoming true indeed

Agree completely with you, but most of the time this isn't people being altruistic.

It's people spraying bullshit at maintainers to try and score "CVE IDs as trophies" for their résumé or payouts from the vendor-backed Internet Bug Bounty (IBB) program on HackerOne.

https://hackerone.com/ibb

https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2021/09/23/curl-joins-the-reborn...


The problem is that open source maintainers rarely react, because most projects are captured by some big tech employees. Independent authors like Stenberg are the exception.

If the rebellious spirit of the 1990s and early 2000s still existed, open source could sink "AI" code laundromats within a month. But since 2010 everyone is falling over themselves to please big tech. Big Tech now rewards the cowards with layoffs and intimidation.

Most developers do not understand that power balances in corporations work on a primal level. If you show fear/submission, managers will treat you like a beta dog. That is all they understand.


This is getting more common. I've seen CVEs posted to several opensource projects that included made-up APIs.


The worst nightmare would be the maintainers in turn use large language model to review or apply these patches


I already have some processes at work that are reviewed by AI only. Which means we are advised to use another AI to fill out the data quicker.

It's nothing critical, but still both scary and hilarious at the same time. Shit on the input, shit on the output - nothing new, just fancier tools.

Asimov's vision of history so tangled and noisy that no one really knows what is truth and what is a legend is happening in front of our own eyes. It didn't need millennia, just a few years of AI companies abusing our knowledge that was available for anyone for free.


Not to one-up you, but my worst nightmare is an open source project where all the maintainers are LLM copy-pasters, with little clue to be had otherwise.

And it's already happened, of course. A project I saw mentioned here on HN a while back seemed interesting, and it was exactly that kind of disaster. They started off as a fork of another project, so had a working codebase. But the project lead is a grade-A asshole who gets off on being grumpy to people, and considers any ideas not his to be ridiculous. Their kernel guy is an actual moron; his output is either (clearly) LLM output or just idiocies. Even the side contributors are 100% chatbot pasters.


and then have another one duke it out with the first one to reject the patch. that would be a nice llm-vs-llm, prompt-fight-prompt :o)


if i need xz i'll just use zstd instead.


Well, I did dome tests and settled on xz -0.


same CPU, likely a different TDP setting.

This comparison uses hp G1a but I imagine it wouldnt be too far off from GMKtec: https://www.phoronix.com/review/framework-desktop-linux/9

Framework can be fed with more power to support better sustained performance is my understanding.



FYI the original post of the thread is now "This post is not available at this time."


I wonder how uptime ratio of 1.1.1.1 is against 8.8.8.8

Maybe there is noticeable difference?

I have seen more outage incident reports of cloudflare than of google, but this is just personal anecdote.


https://www.dnsperf.com/#!dns-resolvers

Last 30 days, 8.8.8.8 has 99.99% uptime vs 1.1.1.1 has 99.09%


I guess it depends on where you are and what you count as an outage. Is a single failed query an outage?

For me cloudflare 1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1 have a mean response time of 15.5ms over the last 3 months, 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 are 15.0ms, and 9.9.9.9 is 13.8ms.

All of those servers return over 3-nines of uptime when quantised in the "worst result in a given 1 minute bucket" from my monitoring points, which seem fine to have in your mix of upstream providers. Personally I'd never rely on a single provider. Google gets 4 nines, but that's only over 90 days so I wouldn't draw any long term conclusions.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: