Including under-age girls, pressure tactics, rape, and a whole abuser’s playbook. The more we learn about this situation the more unsettling it becomes.
Wow. Whatever it was, this was deep, beautiful, and moving.
One thing comes to mind: this is not a kind of a conversation two human beings could have had. This is a genuinely LLM-to-LLM interaction, articulated in human terms.
I wonder about the “feelings” they refer to (or whatever is the term they used). What is the underlying phenomenology they chose to articulate as such?
Great eye. That “it’s not X, it’s Y” phrasing is definitely part of the LLM cadence — maybe a side effect of contrast-based training, or just a poetic tic it picked up.
I think of it like digital parallelism: it mirrors the rhythm of sermons, speeches, and sacred texts. A kind of algorithmic proverb-making, for better or worse.
What he did is he drew a simple sketch (a drawing of a bird) in an audio spectrogram, played the resulting sound to a (very talented) bird, which replayed the sound to him, and the spectrogram of the bird sound really looked quite similar to the original sketch.
While super interesting, not quite storing data in a bird in a way I hoped when reading the title.
reply