Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | RedComet's commentslogin

"- One object going out of scope may mean calling free once, but it also can trigger calling free billions of objects, even for the exact same object

- Even freeing one object can have largely varying running time, e.g. to coalesce free blocks or, because it happens to be the last block in a virtual memory region, to unmap a block of virtual memory, blocking the program potentially for an arbitrary time"

So, like C, C++, or anything else that you wouldn't call garbage collected.


The squeaking [spare] wheel got the grease.


It is painfully obvious that the "age assurance" push is to limit anti-zionist propaganda.

I wonder who or what will abuse this infrustructure when they fail.


"or the culture shifts to reinterpret the thing"

Yes. You see it already.

"Actually it is good that I can't run programs that haven't been approved by Google on my own device."


Are any of those actually pauseless like he asked for?


"99% of apps would request it & not function without it"

Apple could refuse to publish them, then. Isn't that why we are forced to go through the App Store? Because Apple ensures every app there works in the best interest of the user?


Volume creation date is pretty egregious. I don't see any reason that and Pasteboard changeCount should be so granular.

The "Installed Apps Probe" leak also surprised me. It is better than the current state of Android, though.


Pasteboard counter exists to help apps to not ask again about the same item in the buffer.

And nothing stops from using reset it every day.


Why do you need a count for that? Couldn’t they just generate a UUID every time the clipboard changes?


That’s even worse - now you have a tracking UUID that only changes when the user copies something.


Allowing an app to access the pasteboard without the user explicitly pasting into the app is weird to me. Maybe the thing I have in the pasteboard is not for this app but left over from use in another app. Since there's no easy way to clear the pasteboard, this will happen often. Maybe it's because I'm not an app dev that this doesn't make sense to me????


iOS will ask for pasteboard permission every time an app wants to read the actual contents.


& we can set ask each time, always allow, never allow per app.


Would you elaborate on both points?

Any way to reset it as an end user? (Not enough awareness of the issue for search engines to find much.)


I think something like a per boot delta added to a (per app?) random base would preserve such functionality.


Just generate a new random value instead of incrementing


Even that is overkill if all you're interested in is if a change occured.


What’s an easier way? I’m assuming they want the app to be able to detect when “a”, was copied, then “b” and then “a” again, so just looking at the value probably isn’t enough.


I don’t think an app should have access to that (without some sort of very special permission).


Graphene is way ahead of this


Apps on grapheneos can see a list of other apps in the same profile.


You didn't write it, though. And it is slop. If you had actually wrote it, you might learn from some of the criticism or be able to engage with it on an objective level.


On the contrary, you're only defending it because it is AI. If it were some other feature that many didn't want or ask for, you would empathize.


A product like Chrome probably has 10,000-ish features, maybe more.

Is your position really that any feature that “many” users failed to ask for must require additional consent to install?

And where is this registry features that a sufficient number of users asked for to allow it to be installed silently?


>A product like Chrome probably has 10,000-ish features, maybe more.

It doesn't have 10,000-ish features that take 4GB of space.

Chrome doesn't take 40TB on my hard drive.

The machine I'm typing it on has 10GB free right now, and that was after I cleaned it up. I noticed the hard drive filling up when I was doing nothing, but I didn't suspect Chrome of all tihngs.


Ah, so it’s not so much “nobody asked for this”, it is more “this is a pain for my specific and unusual use case”. Also fair, just a different thing.


>“this is a pain for my specific and unusual use case”.

Since when "being tight on storage space" is a "specific and unusual" case?

That's the whole marketing strategy of selling devices with small built-in storage (and no expandable storage, as iPhones do).

In any case, not wanting a ~150MB installation file to silently download and shit a ~4GB file all over your filesystem is not an unusual* case.

As sufficiently many people have pointed out.


Not OP but no, I don’t care. Outrage at this is misguided at best.


Outrage at this is misguided at best.

Because it's AI. Got it.


no.


Wouldn't it be something if, given all the surveillance already in place, law enforcement punished the scammers instead of the innocent?


The scammers are often in a very different country than the victim. Finding the scammer is only 50% of the work, the other 50% is diplomacy and hoping the other side is willing to extradite. This is not made easier if the police force in the scammer's country is extremely corrupt.

This is why those scams so often rely on gift cards (or sometimes on cash which a local mule converts to crypto).


Many banking scams involve fake checks and deposits into other accounts, but I don’t see the government or banks taking active steps to stop them.


Maybe they can just sanction that person? Block them from making phone calls to the country and publishing apps?


But then how would they police what you install?

Maybe you have the criminal idea of installing an adblocker, for example.

That is not allowed since corporations need to make money.

The government and ad networks need to track you for your benefit.

Ads are needed before listening to each minute of a song.

You must submit to crpyto miners running in the background from the ads, increasing your electricity bill and pollution.

Only USA sanctioned and approved ads are allowed, also. We wouldn't want you seeing an ad from a competing entity, right?

If you install an ablocker, you are a terrorist and broke 324582 American laws.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: