The common constituents of space and particles must be extended, reach up to the cosmological horizon, and be of Planck radius.
This yields the modern version of Dirac's scissor trick and thus yields the Dirac equation. The constituents also yield the gauge interactions and the different elementary particles - all as observed. Also general relativity with the field equations arises. So it seems that all of nature is described with Dirac's idea.
Based on Battey-Pratt and Racey, 1980. There seems to be no other visualization of wave functions in the research literature that agrees with observations.
Presents a way to picture how wave functions arise. Explains interference, entanglement, probabilities, and decoherence, as well as the Schrödinger equation and the Dirac equation.
Thank you. It seems that no other option except strands can explain both space and particles. It appears that a smallest length and a smallest area cannot arise in any other way.
The first half of the paper helps shortening your study of physics.
(Generated many comments 8 months ago. I am the author.)
The second, more daring half leads into modern research.
Free preprint, comments and more at https://www.motionmountain.net/9lines
Enjoy!
In nature, the maximum power value
c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W
cannot be exceeded, as stated by Sciama in 1973. Still not much known, the value limits the power of explosions, the luminosity of stars and that of merging black holes. It is also a simple summary of general relativity.
In this house we obey the law of general relativity and forces over c⁵/4G will not be tolerated.
But could someone please explain a little? If I have a widget that does c⁵/4G watts of work when I turn it on, what happens when I turn on a second one? Nothing? Distance between widgets doesn't matter?
By the way, I offer an invitation to dinner to everybody who has a good argument for or against the theory of everything presented in the text.