The whole pipeline (error correction, mapper, router, optimizer) is available with precise instructions.
A black-hole python runner is available alongside the black-hole circuit published paper linked in the README.
Benchpress is easily available from the IBM Benchpress Git repo.
And IBM QPUs can be used for free (they offer 10 min of free QPU usage with a new quantum account)
So the point is, to me, everything is available and reproducible. You could run the full Hayden-Preskill black hole scramble circuit in 10 min from now.
I'm not dismissing what you're saying, I'm badly trying to explain that I'm doing my best to be transparent and give all the possible tools and data. So I'm not sure what else you want me to do...
Good luck with that. If something is easily accessible, it will be accessed by easy people, and if it can flood a platform, it will. Easy people don't care. Easy people will never care.
You'd have to make LLM access harder, or make all platform harder to access, or both. And both will also penalize the not easy people. Like it always does.
'pends. You gotta be antimimetic without saying you are antimimetic.
One answer is to move on from the party when it isn't fun anymore and start a new party. Like the way you are at the bar at last call and get an invitation to a party where they're drinking at someone's house.
More than one statue of limitations ago I was in an activist group that helped take down a public corporation (they deny our responsibility) and it was not hypothetical, we were being infiltrated by the FBI, and pretty regularly we made a new mailing list with names that we trusted and moved our planning there.
Not sure, the city sized craft hovering in the sky maybe.
The tone sounded not serious as well. And because I haven't seen any physics claims per se I went for the humorous tone. Did I make a mistake?
What would be your answer to the OG question?
Fusion, we are currently 100 years away from “true” fusion power. Notably, capturing the gamma potential is far beyond our means. In the sun the gamma release bounces around for approximately ONE MILLION YEARS, ricocheting through a wall of gas 50,000 Earth thick before emerging as the soft glow of sunlight we see. Notably, at the very core that plasmoidal gas is 13 x the density of lead, moving towards the density of water before it reaches the surface.
And then there is the acceleration of counterweights towards the speed of light. Acceleration of 1kg to 99% of the speed of light gives us 7kg of relativistic mass. So careful pulse width modulated acceleration of counterweights of a fraction of the base “craft” mass would make the craft fall up! You would need to manipulate intensive electromagnetic fields to do this safely.
Well, the user guide for the physics of the universe might be powerful and speculative, it still doesn't allow wrong physics anyway.
Your relativistic counterweight doesn't work. Relativistic mass increase is internal to the system.
Conservation of momentum doesn't care how fast your counterweights spin. You still need to eject mass.
You have unlimited range with that open question, I'm sure you can find correct amazing physics to suggest :)
About your advice, what do you mean?
The whole pipeline (error correction, mapper, router, optimizer) is available with precise instructions.
A black-hole python runner is available alongside the black-hole circuit published paper linked in the README.
Benchpress is easily available from the IBM Benchpress Git repo.
And IBM QPUs can be used for free (they offer 10 min of free QPU usage with a new quantum account)
So the point is, to me, everything is available and reproducible. You could run the full Hayden-Preskill black hole scramble circuit in 10 min from now.
I'm not dismissing what you're saying, I'm badly trying to explain that I'm doing my best to be transparent and give all the possible tools and data. So I'm not sure what else you want me to do...