What really needs to be done is to stop using the term “vibe coding” for what really is similar to the “owner-builder” movement in the general contracting/construction industry. Foreman and GCs are not owner-builders. We need another name.
There has never been a qualification required to be allowed to build software for yourself. This is unlike building a house, which most jurisdictions recognise as something that should not be undertaken by someone without the ability to demonstrate a basic understanding of the process.
So, sure, once there's some bare minimum qualification that one must attain to be an "owner-builder" of software, do that. Until then, vibe-coding perfectly describes what vibe-coders do -- except for the vibes, which aren't (obviously).
Vibe coding seems to include a definition of describing things generally or in an unknown way to you and wanting the tech to figure out what you mean, both as a non-technical or technical user.
In 1996/7 I had a chance to use Tcl/Tk to build one of the first stock tickers on the web called DigitalTrader [1], after that we used it to build some of the first vector embeddings in 2005 for early biological language models at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab [2,3] for space biosciences. Still a fan.
How can it be if we have yet to fully define what human intellect is or how it works? Not to mention consciousness. Machine intelligence will always be different than human intelligence.
And, at the heart of AlphaFold2 is the language model, the tip of the spear in AI today. 'Language' can come in many forms e.g. a protein or amino acid sequence.
AlphaFold 2 wasn't Q-learning based. It was supervised SGD and the "evoformer" they introduced is very close to a transformer. So it's not exactly an LLM, but it's a pretty close equivalent for protein data.
This person is forgetting the entire operation is based on space biosciences, not just space. Vector Space Biosciences presents at DeSci London March 2024 - Min: 4:27:33
https://youtu.be/fbnFEvfKRO8?t=16052