Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | John23832's commentslogin

I needed one. Couldn't find both together. Asked Claude.

It's always AI until proven otherwise... even then I'm skeptical.

Ellipses where a comma would suffice? Definitely AI. Not even a good model.

John23832, you are still an AI to me too.

I could point to SO much anxiety in right leaning people. Demographic, financial, political, etc.


This is the actual answer. Very few teams internally actually got access to Claude Code to begin with. All teams still have access to the clause models. It’s a carve out to dogfood the agent.


Startup's have famously traded pay for the "carrot" of outsized returns on equity. The pay always sucks.

Most people do not want to work for subpar pay in the one of the most expensive areas in the US. Especially when you're getting diluted off of the cap table as happens now. You're always ending up behind.

That's before considering people with actual life responsibilities.


This comment seems like 15 years outdated to me. I'm curious what you think "normal" pay and "startup" pay are. Or maybe how early you're drawing the line for defining "startup".

Being in the first handful of non-founder startup employees at some seed stage company is probably not the most lucrative thing, but once companies are post Series A, as far as I can tell they tend to be comp competitive with bigger companies.

Obviously not many companies can compete with Meta or Jane Street for salaries, but that's true whether you're talking about a startup or the majority of the S&P 500 companies.


This is really SDE pay coming back down to earth. You're still making way more than even most white collar jobs at a startup.


Prior revolutions (American, Cultural, French) were all put into action by young, strong, people.

We don't have that anymore. It won't happen. There's no one coming to save us.


Every generation thinks the next is lazy or whatever. It’s universally wrong


I'm not saying anyone is lazy, I'm saying by the numbers the proportion of the population which is young (which did the heavy lifting during the example revolutions) are not there.


Even if you remove the economic interests, human society has always worked with the young taking care of the old. We're reaching the point where there is no more young. That's a problem.

A 20 year old was made 20 years ago.


except automation and technology multiplying labor, right? isnt the point of all this innovation to do more with less. are you saying that fewer people, with the assistance of robots, cant provide food, medicine, shelter, and water to the aging?


do you have any idea how much human labor elder care takes? caring for cognitively impaired but otherwise functioning human beings is a full time++ job, often for more than one person depending on the individual. there’s a reason they keep old folks loaded.


People already lived in Australia before Britain shipped its prisoners there. It was habitable.

Nobody is spending trillions to build a prison on another planet.


The management consulting industry wouldn’t work without them.


I mean does it work? Other than profit making for the consulting companies?

Like someone else pointed out, if people are hiring them in order to provide cover for decision making, then maybe the whole thing being a charade is the point.


You missed the joke.


I think there is a difference between "Eternal Summer" (when everyone got full-time internet in their homes which meant more people around), and "corporate capture" (everything on the internet is corporate interest first, end stage capitalism).


I believe it was “Eternal September”.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: