Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | DaedalusII's commentslogin

tolkien largely copied the nibelungsenlied and accidentally inherited western chauvinism and many other ideas from that lore, including especially a great amount of racism

Nibelungenlied (not Nibelungsenlied) was racist? That needs a citation

a more honest way to look at it would be that the government gets 50% of the employees total expense to the company, so it is basically 50% income tax

the ironic factor is - this is how vw itself started, as did mitsubishi etc

this is called: sensible state industrial policy


Mitsubishi? I disagree. There were founded two years after the Meiji Restoration (~1870) to build cargo ships and (later) mine coal. However, during World War II, they were a huge part of the Japanese war machine.

perfect IT response

regulation are written ambiguously and the specifications do not match the industry

I have even seen regulators refuse to specific legislated laws because "thats not what the government meant", giving a company the choice of following the law and being fined, or breaking the law to please the regulatory agency


Regulators don’t want to provide arbitrarily detail into their interpretation or likely judgements on issues that may come up for many reasons, good and bad.

One good one is that providing concrete razors for compliant and non-compliant behavior accelerates the gaming of the rules.


you should rewrite this comment with chatgpt if you do not want to be dox

https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/ai-can-now-identify-anonymous-i...


opinions vary, but this was the opinion adopted when formulating this index

it probably makes it easier to ship in europe where some private banks and pensions (eg denmark gov) ban defence investment


    > and pensions (eg denmark gov) ban defence investment
I Googled about this. Here is what I found:

    > June 26 (Reuters) - Danish pension fund AkademikerPension has lifted a self-imposed ban on investment in six of Europe's largest arms makers and some smaller groups, it said on Thursday, citing a worsening security situation and the need to boost European defences.
In short: Not any more.

Ref: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/society-equity/danish...


    > the opinion adopted when formulating this index
You raise an excellent point. I did a little bit of Googling and discovered:

    > S&P Shariah indices ... are overseen by an independent Shariah Supervisory Board consisting of a panel of internationally renowned Islamic scholars. This board is facilitated by Ratings Intelligence Partners, a London and Kuwait-based Islamic finance advisory firm.
Ref: https://www.ratingsintelligence.com/

I wonder if these Islamic scholars are scholars or "scholars"

Like how major churches in the US are overseen by "Bible college" graduates whose qualifications are basically "charismatic enough to get VC funding and attract loads of the most superficial of Christians searching for Biblical justification for their bad behavior"

(Not to suggest that there's a religion that is perfect, but when I sit in on a megachurch service that is transparently justifying child rape by Trump, and advocating that the Bible requires us to support Palestinian genocide, and the pastor went to a two-year Bible school but looks fucking cool like right out of a rock n roll photo spread, it's hard to equate that morally with, say, dorky-ass 70yo episcopalians and the occasional sins of leadership)


I found the board members here: https://www.ratingsintelligence.com/shariah-supervisory-boar...

It looks legit to me.


There are many valid complaints about public markets undervaluing businesses in comparison to private markets, now that everyone is putting their money on the line we start to see a different view being taken

which is exactly why public markets have always been a superior price discovery mechanism in comparison to private markets


The ability to short stocks in public markets also helps.

you cant take out life insurance on your spouse without them signing the paperwork in most cases

you dont take out cover on your business partner, the company itself does


True but you're still taking it out on another person.


some life insurance policies pay out for suicide after an initial exclusion period. this is often six or twelve months. insurers can include it because suicide claims are relatively uncommon.

if there is evidence that someone took out the policy with the intention of creating a claim then the insurer may treat it as fraud and decline it.


yeah its awesome, the only side effect is mental illness and dementia


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: