I am not sure where the OP is hearing that the hype cycle is dissipating, but MCP adoption is actually accelerating, not decreasing [1]

More than 200% growth in official MCP servers in past 6 months: https://bloomberry.com/blog/we-analyzed-1400-mcp-servers-her...

He's talking about the vanguard; early adopters. Growth is in the bigger, later stages of the funnel.

According to some slop blog?

There's loads of companies that use Discord, but they all seem to be blockchain/gaming companies [1]

I think Discord has the same problem that FB faced when it tried to launch their FB Workplace product. It has the perception of being "fun" and not serious/professional.

If I were you, I'd pay the $$$ for Slack. The ability to search past conversations has saved me hours of productivity and well worth it

[1] https://bloomberry.com/data/discord/

He is just comment squatting :)

>> Social status is really, really important - if you don't buy the evolutionary reasons, it's still important for basic human connection.

You dont want to do dumb things that might get you in jail and have rveryone shun you.

But should u be so afraid of brusing your ego that you shy away from: starting a business (if u have the financial means), asking someone out, publishing something in public, etc

Sometimes evolution overshoots, esp when our environment changes

Building Bloomberry to help sales teams find companies that use any technology or SaaS product.

Example: Slack: https://bloomberry.com/data/slack/

Just commenting to let you know I enjoyed exploring your site and reading your posts.

LLMs do not read llms.txt

Right at the precise moment I decide to git pull!

Not these days in my experience. Maybe 5-10 years ago. I imagine Google is so indundated with so much spam, and AI slop they are being more discrimantory on what to crawl and index

I’m looking at this from a 3rd party of view (definitely not claiming the .net “deserves” to rank higher)

1) the .net version has a couple of very high authority links, namely from theregister and thenewstack (both of which have had lots of engagement).

I highly doubt it would have ranked without those links.

2) its only been a week. Give Google time to understand which pages should rank higher.

3) Google is biased towards sites that cover a topic earlier than others.

I’ve seen pages that are still top 3 for a particular competitive query years later, simply because they were one of the first to write about it.

Suggestions: give it time. Meanwhile I would recommend linking to your website rather than your github everywhere you mention it, to give it a boost

If it saves anyone else the effort: I went to doublecheck the claim that those articles cited the wrong page, and it seems you're correct on The Register, but archive.org's earliest copies of the other two articles don't seem to reference the impostor site. They refer instead to the GitHub.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260301133636/https://www.there... https://web.archive.org/web/20260211162657/https://venturebe... https://web.archive.org/web/20260220201539/https://thenewsta...

>> I’ve seen pages that are still top 3 for a particular competitive query years later, simply because they were one of the first to write about it.

With so many copycats on the internet, first to publish seems like a fairly good indication of the original source. But as we can see here, that's not always true.

> 3) Google is biased towards sites that cover a topic earlier than others.

> I’ve seen pages that are still top 3 for a particular competitive query years later, simply because they were one of the first to write about it.

Reason why I still always get the Java 8 docs for any search. Annoying.

I think the real reason for that is simply that a lot of people are still running Java 8 (so those docs still see a lot of traffic). I remember reading that it's still used by something like 25% of Java developers.

Most of the problem is the "only been a week" part, likely. Though you're fighting an algorithm that's been patched in inconsistent places for all sorts of weights like "authority" and "quality".

Thousands of little weights driven by obscure attributes of the site that you're not really going to figure out by thrashing and changing stuff.

I think the precaution developers should take is having a website and adding a page to it for each project.

If you must just have a repo self host it. In fact, selfhost the repo in any case.