Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Amorymeltzer's commentslogin

To name a few components:

- Older chip (and with fewer thermal constraints)

- Only one camera (and much cheaper)

- Less RAM than 17pro and Air

- No cell modem, FaceID, ProMotion, MagSafe, etc.


Much bigger screen, keyboard, big battery, lots of copper and aluminum, extra USB port, touchpad, a charger.

Those are really basic parts that are really cheap to make with current tech at least.

Which of the parts you mentioned are by definition more expensive? A modem? FaceID is 10 y/o now btw. You're just speculating and selling this as facts. Meanwhile actual material like aluminum, copper, lithium and others are genuinely expensive and the difference in weight of the precious metals and alloys used is obvious.

Well, the Library of Congress entry notes him as "Gugusse the clown" and the Wikipedia entry[2] has a few citations (to books, I can't verify) that support it, but more to the point, "Pierrot" is a classic[3] stock character in e.g. commedia dell'arte. It says clown but I think our modern meaning of that word is a bit removed, and perhaps "harlequin" (another character[4]) is more what we'd say these days.

1: <https://www.loc.gov/item/2026125501/?loclr=blogloc>

2: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gugusse_and_the_Automaton>

3: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierrot>

4: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlequin>


For that in particular, I use delta (<https://github.com/dandavison/delta>) with `side-by-side = true` enabled. I find I use both icdiff and delta side-by-side on a regular basis.

Delta is so much faster than icdiff too.

This reminds me of one of my favorite YouTube series, Your Dinosaurs Are Wrong. They were short little videos where a guy had a toy dinosaur and he would explain why the toy was incorrect. Short, easy to understand, fun, and I learned a lot. Highly recommend to anyone of any age.

Playlist of the original videos: <https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaCDmykyjVw_B983AQ2iG...>, there's a channel now <https://www.youtube.com/@YourDinosaursAreWrong> which has newer episodes (can't vouch for, haven't seen) (playlist with old and (some of the) new: <https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnpbQOy7TfC179wPmhHZr...>)


>Orwell's mistake lay in thinking there had to be actual war to keep the merry-go-round of the balance of power in being. In fact, in one of the more laughable parts of the book, he goes on and on concerning the necessity of permanent war as a means of consuming the world's production of resources and thus keeping the social stratification of upper, middle, and lower classes in being. (This sounds like a very Leftist explanation of war as the result of a conspiracy worked out with great difficulty.)

>In actual fact, the decades since 1945 have been remarkably war-free as compared with the decades before it. There have been local wars in profusion, but no general war. But then, war is not required as a desperate device to consume the world's resources. That can be done by such other devices as endless increase in population and in energy use, neither of which Orwell considers.

...

>He did not foresee the role of oil or its declining availability or its increasing price, or the escalating power of those nations who control it. I don't recall his mentioning the word 'oil'.

I feel like Asimov completely misses the point here. The fact that we didn't have the kind of "general war" Orwell wrote about doesn't mean this isn't meaningful or relevant, it just means we didn't do that then. Jump forward a few decades and it's not hard to imagine e.g. the Bush years of the US in Iraq and Afghanistan rhyming with Orwell a bit.

And, perhaps it's inevitable given this is from 1980, but Asimov is stuck in the overpopulation-as-demon narrative and peak-oil stuff. Neither of those have lasted the test of time.


The perpetual war is just a framework for Orwell's autocrats needing to direct the anger of the populace away from themselves. We have this today with government propaganda stirring up renewed hatred of brown people to deflect from their ineptitude. Conveniently blowing up in their faces when it turns out to be much easier to hate pedophile protectors.


Isn't Asimov mistaking the Party's self rationalization and use of war (that might not even still be going on) as a statement of Orwell beliefs?


Asimov was definitely stuck in the moment of 1980, energy insecurity from the oil crisis of the time.

We are now transitioning away from oil, world wide, and energy scarcity is more about preventing regulatory structures from getting in the way of new wind, solar, and battery resources.

Overpopulation was also a bugaboo of the time, but I thought that was mostly a leftist problem.


Or the wealth could accumulate in the hands of a few


There was a discussion recently on the Wikimedia wikitech-l discussion list, and one participant had a comment I appreciated:

>I'm of the opinion if people can tell you are using an LLM you are using it wrong.

They continued:

>It's still expected that you fully understand any patch you submit. I think if you use an LLM to help you nobody would complain or really notice, but if you blindly submit an LLM authored patch without understanding how it works people will get frustrated with you very quickly.

<https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikitech-l@lists...>


I highly recommend the book of the same title—a collection of her essays. I read it year or two ago, and it's excellent: gorgeous writing, and definitely a touchstone of the time. "I think we are well advised to keep on nodding terms with the people we used to be, whether we find them attractive company or not," from "On Keeping a Notebook," is something I think about a lot.

The essay itself is, of course, fantastic, but I find that, although she specifically tells us not to, it is impossible not to dwell on young children taking acid.


>although she specifically tells us not to, it is impossible not to dwell on young children taking acid.

well any of those young kids taking acid would be coming up on retirement age now, so I guess the reasonable thing would be to try to find out how it all went.


I'm sure their files have been paid necessary attention to deep inside some 3-letter agency. One hell of a coincidence:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haight_Ashbury_Free_Clinic

"Louis Jolyon West—a LSD researcher involved in MKUltra—lived near the clinic, and was allowed by Smith to recruit clients for experiments.[7]"


All files related to MKUltra were destroyed in 1973, at the orders of CIA director Richard Helms. So, not so much.

Guess the CIA really didn't want their experiments with Charles Manson to come to light.

(Yes, yes, there only exists circumstantial evidence of a CIA/Manson connection. Because they burned the files.)


I particularly like (what I assume is) the subtle paean to Ted Chiang's "Blurry Jpeg of the Web" in there.

<https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-...>


Other recommendations in other siblings, but Neptunes on macOS and Finale on iOS are excellent. I only got into it a couple years ago, but aside from a few quirks, using those two has been super smooth and easy.


>Archive: Anything you have a feeling might be useful

>Delete: Anything you’re pretty sure would be useless in the future

Basically what I do, but the problem for a certain type of mind is that "might be useful" is a pretty broad category to fall down. "Years and years of Perl mailing lists in case I want to search them instead of SE/PerlMonks/etc." Yeah, in theory. "Any newsletter I haven't ever read?" I mean, in theory I might search for something from 2011. "ThinkGeek purchases from back in the day?" Yes, definitely! So, in practice, just archive, and let your search results be polluted by daily newsletters.

Still, I try and keep Merlin Mann's Wisdom advice in mind:

>Organizing your email is like alphabetizing your recycling.

That being said, though, there's a line that only becomes clearer and clearer as time goes on: family and friends >>> everything else. I'd take a relative's email I didn't want to reply to when I was in college over pretty much anything. Do whatever you need to do to keep that.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: