I do not forsee GoogleClaw, MetaClaw, and AppleClaw all playing well with each other. Everyone will have their own walled garden and we will be no better off than we are now.
I knew I had to add GLaDOS as soon as I saw this. Unfortunately, while testing my PR I realized there’s no support for Linux. Hopefully someone smarter than me can get that added sooner rather than later.
Is there any reason why one would use an ad-filled ChatGPT over any alternative or open-source LLM providers? I feel like things have stagnated from a model perspective for simple queries one might ask ChatGPT. The key differentiators for it being their user intent understanding, web search tooling, and deep research/thinking mode, all of which are much smaller moats compared to training an LLM.
I think most free tier users will stick with chatgpt given its brand stickiness and lack of obstacles (disposable login page). If you can run your own llm models you’re definitely not the target demographic
This is working a lot like Meta/Facebook where they have got immense data about your interests.
Google Search OTOH has been using broad matched queries and is deciding which keywords to show your Ads.
I heard from many people that they don't like this approach of Google Search Ads now.
As they are blowing up more money for useless keywords they didn't want to target.
The only option they have is to add negative keywords - that mostly happens after the money is spent on junk keywords.
Senior Data Scientist with 5+ years of experience building and scaling ML, analytics, and GenAI systems. Expertise in large-scale data analysis, model evaluation, and experimentation. Proficient in Python, SQL, Spark, and statistics, with a Computer Engineering foundation.
Location: San Francisco, CA
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies:
* Programming Languages: Python, SQL (Presto, Postgres, Spark), R, PHP/Hack, Bash
* Frameworks: PyData (Pandas, NumPy, scikit-learn), PyTorch/Lightning, TensorFlow/Keras, PySpark, LangChain, XGBoost
* Tools: AWS, GCP, Spark, Gurobi, Kubernetes, Docker, Linux, Git, Tableau, OpenAI API
Résumé/CV: https://kavi.sh/assets/resume/KavishHukmani_resume.pdf
Email: khukmani at gmail.com
GitHub: https://github.com/DoubleGremlin181
Website: https://kavi.sh/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kavish-hukmani/
What’s even the point of this? Is showing random videos really driving up engagement more than surfacing the video I want to watch? This was shocking to me when I first came across it
Yes. They know that most humans typically have poor impulse control, and are easily pulled off task and will fall into an addicting and lucrative loop. Makes perfect sense to show random unrelated shit.
The article is glaring over a key point- Valve often sold the model at a 20% discount for $320. Clearly this is because the amount spent by a Steam Deck owner would make up the loss in BoM. If they believed they could continue to do so, they would.
IMO this is a smart move. A lot of these next-gen dev tools are genuinely great, but the ecosystem is fragmented and the subscriptions add up quickly. If Cursor aquires a few more, like Warp or Linear, they can become a very compelling all-in-one dev platform.
reply